Re: insane over-regulation - what not to do

2006-06-21 Thread Randy Bush
> That's going to be fun to watch. from the outside, not from the inside randy

Re: insane over-regulation - what not to do

2006-06-21 Thread David W. Hankins
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 10:36:04AM -0700, Randy Bush wrote: > the whole thing as a piece. it looks to be a, likely well-meaning, > attempt by a gang of bureaucrats and a fancy consultant to put the > universe in a glass jar and preserve it. from end user, to net > operations, to infrastructure, t

RE: insane over-regulation - what not to do

2006-06-21 Thread Bill Woodcock
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Randy Whitney wrote: > Could you be more specific? Are you talking about "Part VIII > DOMAIN NAME REGISTAR" or something else? Not presuming to answer for Randy, just for myself: This follows one of the typical failure-modes of technical legislation, which is

RE: insane over-regulation - what not to do

2006-06-21 Thread Randy Bush
> Could you be more specific? Are you talking about "Part VIII > DOMAIN NAME REGISTAR" or something else? the whole thing as a piece. it looks to be a, likely well-meaning, attempt by a gang of bureaucrats and a fancy consultant to put the universe in a glass jar and preserve it. from end user,

Re: insane over-regulation - what not to do

2006-06-21 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:21:34 CDT, Jerry Pasker said: > I like Part XIII, Subsecton 115. "Thing." myself. Actually, that serves a very important purpose - it codifies the concept that a string of ones and zeros can represent something with actual value. If it wasn't there, a defendant could argu

RE: insane over-regulation - what not to do

2006-06-21 Thread Jerry Pasker
Could you be more specific? Are you talking about "Part VIII DOMAIN NAME REGISTAR" or something else? rsw. I like Part XIII, Subsecton 115. "Thing." myself. -Jerry

RE: insane over-regulation - what not to do

2006-06-21 Thread Randy Whitney
Could you be more specific? Are you talking about "Part VIII DOMAIN NAME REGISTAR" or something else? rsw. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Randy Bush > Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 12:59 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: insa