On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 19:34:55 -0400 (EDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> When you're dealing with what some people refer to as "tier 1 providers"
> (I'll just say really big networks), this can be counter-productive.
> From
> what I've seen the following providers have been notoriousl
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Richard Welty wrote:
> > Then the ISP shouldn't be punished just because they wrote a bad
> > contract.
>
> actually, i think Valdis was alluding to the Paetec fiasco with Monsterhut.
> in that particular case, the contract was ok, but Monsterhut lied to the
> court about t
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:25:05 EDT, Richard Welty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> actually, i think Valdis was alluding to the Paetec fiasco with Monsterhut.
Correct.
msg02845/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:07:40 -0400 (EDT) "Steven J. Sobol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > What do you do if the ISP says "We want to turn them off, but they've
> managed
> > to get a restraining order preventing us"? We've seen THAT
