Are there any other good lists out there that you folks have had good
experience with? Any that we might want to consider taking a look at?
Thanks,
As a follow-up to my previous post, for those interested, the IADB
(ISIPP Accreditation Database) is now officially up and running. We'll
give a c
on Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 07:36:36PM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
> reject_rbl_client blackholes.easynet.nl,
> reject_rbl_client dynablock.easynet.nl,
> reject_rbl_client proxies.easynet.nl
FYI, easynet.nl stopped hosting their DNSBLs in December.
http://groups.google.com/group
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Brandon Shiers") writes:
> We are using the following RBL's on our MTA right now:
>
> Spamhaus (sbl-xbl)
> DSBL
> NJABL (dynablock)
>
> Are there any other good lists out there that you folks have had good
> experience with? Any that we might want to consider taking a look
From Richard Welty, received 3/3/04, 19:36 -0500 (GMT):
Mind if I ask why you don't use the sbl-xbl?
keep in mind that the sbl is the combination of "sbl classic"
with the xbl, where the xbl is currently a feed of the cbl that may
at a later date incorporate additional lists or data.
I trust yo
Also, I like sender verification, but that's me.
i used it for some time, and reluctantly shut it down. blocked a lot
of email
abuse, but too many false positives for my taste.
Could you go into more detail?
...
Maybe I have others I just don't know about? How many people send
legit e-mail wi
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 18:35:27 -0500 "Patrick W.Gilmore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 3, 2004, at 6:00 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
> >> Of the ones above, I only use spamhaus, combined with opm.blitzed.org
> >> &
> >> relays.visi.com
> > i use the same ones as Patrick, but i also use the cbl (a
[I know it is not spam-l, but I still am interested. :-]
On Mar 3, 2004, at 6:32 PM, Nathan Allen Stratton wrote:
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Scott Call wrote:
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Nathan Allen Stratton wrote:
Have you look at graylisting, temp failing mail with a
sender/receiver/IP
you have not seen b
On Mar 3, 2004, at 6:00 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
Of the ones above, I only use spamhaus, combined with opm.blitzed.org
&
relays.visi.com
i use the same ones as Patrick, but i also use the cbl (a component of
the
spamhaus xbl, perhaps the only one at the present time, but that could
change.)
Min
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Scott Call wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Nathan Allen Stratton wrote:
>
> > Have you look at graylisting, temp failing mail with a sender/receiver/IP
> > you have not seen before?
>
> I don't know what the prevailing attitude is, but it seems to me
> that 451ing unknown senders
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:45:59 -0500 "Patrick W.Gilmore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 3, 2004, at 4:23 PM, Brandon Shiers wrote:
> > Just a real quick question for the folks on the Nanog list:
> > We are using the following RBL's on our MTA right now:
> > Spamhaus (sbl-xbl)
> > DSBL
> > NJAB
I don't know what the prevailing attitude is, but it seems to me
that 451ing unknown senders is a good way to get on the bad side of
sysadmins who have to deal with the backlog until your server decides to
accept them.
I would think if you're willing to spend other's resources on reducing
your s
On Mar 3, 2004, at 4:23 PM, Brandon Shiers wrote:
Just a real quick question for the folks on the Nanog list:
We are using the following RBL's on our MTA right now:
Spamhaus (sbl-xbl)
DSBL
NJABL (dynablock)
Are there any other good lists out there that you folks have had good
experience with? A
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Brandon Shiers wrote:
> Are there any other good lists out there that you folks have had good
> experience with? Any that we might want to consider taking a look at?
> Thanks,
Have you look at graylisting, temp failing mail with a sender/receiver/IP
you have not seen before?
Greetings from Wyoming --
Just a real quick question for the folks on the Nanog list:
We are using the following RBL's on our MTA right now:
Spamhaus (sbl-xbl)
DSBL
NJABL (dynablock)
Are there any other good lists out there that you folks have had good
experience with? Any that we might want to
14 matches
Mail list logo
