So, What Now, NANOG? Was: Request response [important]

2004-03-18 Thread Daniel Golding
On 3/17/04 9:51 PM, Brian Bruns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Erm, something is definately up tonight. Message is below, for those of you who didn't want to touch this message. I can't get to the site listed in the message, so I have no idea what its trying to deliver exactly. Anyone care

Re: So, What Now, NANOG? Was: Request response [important]

2004-03-18 Thread Joshua Brady
- Original Message - From: Daniel Golding [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Brian Bruns [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Susan Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 11:11 AM Subject: So, What Now, NANOG? Was: Request response [important] On 3/17/04 9:51 PM, Brian Bruns

Re: So, What Now, NANOG? Was: Request response [important]

2004-03-18 Thread Adam Rothschild
On 2004-03-18-11:11:14, Daniel Golding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] Its time to figure out what to do about this, employing a proactive stance. The answer is not start a new mailing list. Names have power, as they say, and NANOG has the juice. So, a few simple proposals for people to chew

Re: So, What Now, NANOG? Was: Request response [important]

2004-03-18 Thread william(at)elan.net
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Daniel Golding wrote: Its time to figure out what to do about this, employing a proactive stance. The answer is not start a new mailing list. Names have power, as they say, and NANOG has the juice. So, a few simple proposals for people to chew over... 1) Turn on list