On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 07:22:51PM -0600, Gadi Evron wrote:
...
> 2. If you haven't already, I strongly recommend checking your network for
> machines running telnet, and more specifcially, vulnerable to this
> particular issue.
NO. The telnet DAEMON. NOT telnet. *sigh* Too many releases
con
On 14-Feb-2007, at 09:59, MARLON BORBA wrote:
I agree with Gadi. Everything which affects Internet stability
(e.g. DNS
denial-of-service attacks) deserves attention of network operators.
IMHO
it's time to think about a new NANOG AUP.
The NANOG charter says that the people responsible for
I agree with Gadi. Everything which affects Internet stability (e.g. DNS
denial-of-service attacks) deserves attention of network operators. IMHO
it's time to think about a new NANOG AUP.
If, as Gadi says, "not all of us can handle all that an ISP would
care", all of us (network operators, sysadm
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
>
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Do you know of any network operators who have no Solaris boxes at all
> > used in the management of some part of their network? Seems to me that
> > it is very common for network operators to use Solaris boxe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do you know of any network operators who have no Solaris boxes at all
> used in the management of some part of their network? Seems to me that
> it is very common for network operators to use Solaris boxes to manage
> their networks. And while they may have ACLs to
> Subject: Re: Solaris telnet vuln solutions digest and network risks
> This post appears to have been written for another mailing
> list (where it is
> probably on-topic). Why did you repost it to NANOG-L?
Do you know of any network operators who have no Solaris boxes at all
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Albert Meyer wrote:
> Gadi Evron wrote:
> > A couple of updates and a summary digest of useful information shared from
> > all around on this vulnerability, for those of us trying to make sense of
> > what it means to our networks:
>
> Gadi,
>
> This post appears to have bee
Gadi Evron wrote:
A couple of updates and a summary digest of useful information shared from
all around on this vulnerability, for those of us trying to make sense of
what it means to our networks:
Gadi,
This post appears to have been written for another mailing list (where it is
probably on
A couple of updates and a summary digest of useful information shared from
all around on this vulnerability, for those of us trying to make sense of
what it means to our networks:
1. Sun released a patch (although it is not a final one). It can be found
on their site ( http://sunsolve.sun.com/tpa
