T1 bonding

2006-01-24 Thread Matt Bazan
Can someone shed some technical light on the details of how two T1's are bonded (typically). We've got two sets of T's at two different location with vendor 'X' (name starts w/ an 'A') and it appears that we're really only getting about 1 full T's worth of bandwidth and maybe 20% of the second.

Re: T1 bonding

2006-01-24 Thread Elijah Savage
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matt Bazan wrote: Can someone shed some technical light on the details of how two T1's are bonded (typically). We've got two sets of T's at two different location with vendor 'X' (name starts w/ an 'A') and it appears that we're really only

RE: T1 bonding

2006-01-24 Thread Scott Morris
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Elijah Savage Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 7:28 PM To: Matt Bazan Cc: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: T1 bonding -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matt Bazan wrote: Can someone shed some technical light

Re: T1 bonding

2006-01-24 Thread PC
Is it ATT? If so, they only use Cisco Express Forwarding on the router, or so that's at least what I was told by the level 1 techs. If packet order reassembly is a an issue and the link is oversubscribed (IE: Heavy VoIP/gaming use), this method isn't the greatest over others like MLPPP, or

Re: T1 bonding

2006-01-24 Thread Elijah Savage
which is a vendor-agnostic approach for the most part. Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Elijah Savage Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 7:28 PM To: Matt Bazan Cc: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: T1 bonding Matt Bazan wrote

RE: T1 bonding

2006-01-24 Thread Scott Morris
-Original Message- From: Elijah Savage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 8:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: 'Matt Bazan'; nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: T1 bonding -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Scott Morris wrote: If you're treating them as two separate links

Re: T1 bonding

2006-01-24 Thread Elijah Savage
'A' as further definition, not as two separate vendors. *shrug* Scott -Original Message- From: Elijah Savage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 8:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: 'Matt Bazan'; nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: T1 bonding Scott Morris wrote

Re: T1 bonding

2006-01-24 Thread Wil Schultz
They can be bonded via MLPPP or IMA, as stated previously. Also they can be load-balanced via EIGRP. What are you using to test your bandwidth (IPerf is pretty handy)? I'm kinda assuming that the T1's are point to point, how far apart are the offices? -Wil Matt Bazan wrote: Can someone