One of the biggest issues with the list as I've seen from time to
time from my perspective, is the definition of operations. So on a
quick breakdown of the logical definition of NANOG, I derive
Operations of the North American Network. The problem with this
stems from far too many
Concur. Nanog has been an on-going education in essentially all
aspects of internetworking, routing, data centres, security,
spam/malware/abuse. Long may it stay that way. I'd argue that the
fuzziness is probably a reflection of the ever-broadening role of
IT/telco/netops people and ideas in
J. Oquendo rambled incoherently, saying in relevant part:
William Allen Simpson wrote:
Especially as I'm not aware of any Network Operator worth their salt that
doesn't have regular contact with their support call centers.
Regular contact? As in finding the name of someone who actually has a
One of the biggest issues with the list as I've seen from time to time from my
perspective, is the definition of operations. So on a quick breakdown of the
logical definition of NANOG, I derive Operations of the North American
Network. The problem with this stems from far too many bastardizing
