Howdy, I know with the trans-atlantic and trans-pacific
connectivity being what it is these days that getting reliable (i.e. low
latency 200, low packet loss 5% total round-trip) to countries such as AE
and others is kind of a shot in the dark. However, I wanted to ping the
Drew Weaver wrote:
Howdy, I know with the trans-atlantic and trans-pacific connectivity
being what it is these days that getting reliable (i.e. low latency
200, low packet loss 5% total round-trip) to countries such as AE
and others is kind of a “shot in the dark”. However, I wanted to
Before we flame Sargun for posting useless non sense, I figured I
would throw my opinions in.
I have seen great international results with some of the carriers you
currently have, but if you are adding a fourth which areas are you
looking to benefit most? Transatlantic/transpacific? I would
Drew Weaver wrote:
How about to this IP?
62.150.200.10
-Original Message-
From: Sargun Dhillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 1:58 PM
To: Drew Weaver
Cc: 'nanog@merit.edu'
Subject: Re: US transit providers with slightly better than average
International
providers with slightly better than average
International connectivity?
Drew Weaver wrote:
How about to this IP?
62.150.200.10
-Original Message-
From: Sargun Dhillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 1:58 PM
To: Drew Weaver
Cc: 'nanog@merit.edu'
Subject: Re: US
