- Original Message -
From: "william(at)elan.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, February 14, 2005 2:22 pm
Subject: Re: Verizon wins MCI
>
>
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
>
> > I was set on QUUest or UUQwest for the new nam
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 06:56:54PM +, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
> we aim to please? or was there some hidden meaning to your email/troll?
1. I didn't realize that accurately reporting the facts was now considered
a "troll". Fascinating.
2. Nope, there's no hidden meaning -- unless you're
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Christopher L. Morrow
> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 1:57 PM
> To: Rich Kulawiec
> Cc: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Verizon wins MCI
>
>
>
>
> On T
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 11:38:10PM -0500, Jon Lewis wrote:
> > But does anyone really know how big WorldCon is/was?
>
> Well, by one metric, they're #1:
>
> Rank ISP Number of currently-listed spam issues
> --- ---
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 11:38:10PM -0500, Jon Lewis wrote:
> But does anyone really know how big WorldCon is/was?
Well, by one metric, they're #1:
RankISP Number of currently-listed spam issues
--- --- --
1
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
> Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Alex Rubenstein wrote:
> >>
> >>
> But does anyone really know how big WorldCon is/was? First thing
> Verizon will have to do is fire the entire billing de
Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
Alex Rubenstein wrote:
But does anyone really know how big WorldCon is/was? First thing
Verizon will have to do is fire the entire billing department
and replace them with people/systems that can generate correct
bills
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Lewis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Posted At: Monday, February 14, 2005 8:38 PM
> Posted To: NANOG
> Conversation: Verizon wins MCI
> Subject: Re: Verizon wins MCI
>
>
>
>
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
> Alex Rubenstein wrote:
> > > But does anyone really know how big WorldCon is/was? First thing
> > > Verizon will have to do is fire the entire billing department
> > > and replace them with people/systems that can generate correct
> > > bills and send
Jon Lewis wrote:
But does anyone really know how big WorldCon is/was? First thing Verizon
will have to do is fire the entire billing department and replace them
with people/systems that can generate correct bills and send them to the
correct customers.
You've got to be kidding me! Fear the day t
Alex Rubenstein wrote:
> But does anyone really know how big WorldCon is/was? First thing
> Verizon will have to do is fire the entire billing department
> and replace them with people/systems that can generate correct
> bills and send them to the correct customers.
Thats right! I forgot that V
But does anyone really know how big WorldCon is/was? First thing Verizon
will have to do is fire the entire billing department and replace them
with people/systems that can generate correct bills and send them to the
correct customers.
Thats right! I forgot that Verizon was capable of billing co
At 11:45 PM 2/14/2005, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
uhm, thats the '70 billing departments' ... or so said the SEC's info
about how many billing systems were 'integrated' during the
bernie-dynastic-times.
I remember reading in IT Week or Infoweek or some other trade rag that they
had over 2400 sof
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Jon Lewis wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, william(at)elan.net wrote:
>
> > > Verizon wins the battle for MCI, pays < 7B.
> >
> > I'm not financier, but this price seems rather low considering how large
> > Worldcom is/used to be and that it includes all former UUNET, MCI, MF
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, william(at)elan.net wrote:
> > Verizon wins the battle for MCI, pays < 7B.
>
> I'm not financier, but this price seems rather low considering how large
> Worldcom is/used to be and that it includes all former UUNET, MCI, MFS,
> WCOM, etc. BTW - did this include Digex as well?
On Feb 14, 2005, at 2:31 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:22:36 -0800 (PST)
From: "william(at)elan.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
I was set on QUUest or UUQwest for the new name, too.
What, don't you like UUVeriNET
> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:22:36 -0800 (PST)
> From: "william(at)elan.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
>
> > I was set on QUUest or UUQwest for the new name, too.
>
> What, don't you like UUVeriNET even better? :)
>
>
)elan.net
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 2:23 PM
To: Hannigan, Martin
Cc: 'nanog@merit.edu'
Subject: Re: Verizon wins MCI
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
> I was set on QUUest or UUQwest for the new name, too.
What, don't you like UUVeriNET even better? :)
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
> I was set on QUUest or UUQwest for the new name, too.
What, don't you like UUVeriNET even better? :)
> Verizon wins the battle for MCI, pays < 7B.
I'm not financier, but this price seems rather low considering how large
Worldcom is/used to be a
> From: "Hannigan, Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I was set on QUUest or UUQwest for the new name, too.
>
> Verizon wins the battle for MCI, pays < 7B.
VerizUUtal?
--
A host is a host from coast to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
& no one will talk to a host that's close[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless
I was set on QUUest or UUQwest for the new name, too.
Verizon wins the battle for MCI, pays < 7B.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1802&e=2&u=/washpost/2005021
4/ts_washpost/a22085_2005feb13
--
Martin Hannigan (c) 617-388-2663
VeriSign, Inc.
21 matches
Mail list logo
