On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> We're an ISP. I'm blocking 135 and the other netbios ports inbound on my
> clients dial-up/dsl lines because if I didn't, the lines would be useless.
Sunday morning posting. I'm blocking these ports OUTBOUND -- TO our
clients. Their lines a
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> dodgy behaviour (spoofed source addresses, for one). Yes, port 135 is a
> known vector, and so is now, but they have their legitimate uses. If
OK, here's an alternative viewpoint.
We're an ISP. I'm blocking 135 and the other netbios ports inbo
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, Sean Donelan wrote:
> The recurring theme is: I don't want my ISP to block anything I do, but
> ISPs should block other people from doing things I don't think they
> should do.
That's about my position, I guess.There's a difference between
naively blocking ports or screw
