Re: a call for peace (Re: SMTP AUTH)

2005-05-02 Thread Randy Bush
>> does a better job. The following does very nicely for me, for the >> record :-) >> >>> # Valley of the Kooks >>> >>> :0 >>> * ^(From|To|Cc):.*baptista@(pccf\.net|dot-god\.com) >>> /dev/null >>> >>> :0 >>> * ^(From|To|Cc):[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> /dev/null >>> >>> :0 >>> * >>> ^(From|To|Cc):.*(jim

Re: a call for peace (Re: SMTP AUTH)

2005-05-02 Thread paul
i quoted somebody as saying: > >> :0 > >> * ^From:.*<[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> /dev/null and was told by an actual procmail user the following: > That regex needs some work (the left-angle bracket excludes messages sent > with a bare address), and: > > > it does no good for me to filter out the

Re: a call for peace (Re: SMTP AUTH)

2005-05-02 Thread Steven Champeon
on Mon, May 02, 2005 at 01:55:19PM +, Paul Vixie wrote: > > in this interminable thread from hell, someone finally said the magic words: > > > Thankfully, there's always procmail. > > and helpfully gave a specific recipe: Yeah, but not the one you really need. Thankfully, there's always mo

a call for peace (Re: SMTP AUTH)

2005-05-02 Thread Paul Vixie
in this interminable thread from hell, someone finally said the magic words: > Thankfully, there's always procmail. and helpfully gave a specific recipe: > :0 > * ^From:.*<[EMAIL PROTECTED] > /dev/null now, speaking as someone who went around the loop a few times with dv8 on the topic of PPLB,