--On tisdag 27 juli 2004 12.34 -0400 Sean Donelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> The A record for ad.doubleclick.net is missing from DNS. This is
> causing apparent web page slowdowns when viewing web sites containing ads
> linked to ad.doubleclick.net
Not here, even works when I'm not con
On 7/27/2004 6:21 PM, John Palmer wrote:
> Now the question is, can one easily block all of doubleclick.net
Couple of methods that have worked for me.
If you have squid or similar, you can get a plugin that lets you redirect
various sites/domains to a 1x1 transparent gif. This method is prefer
Paul Vixie wrote:
> on the other hand, if you do this for a nameserver that your customers
> depend on, then there is probably some liability for either trademark
> infringement, tortious interference with prospective economic advantage,
> and the gods alone know what else. if you do this, keep
On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 21:44, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> on the one hand, you'd need a wildcard A RR at *.doubleclick.net to
> achieve this result. the above text does not mention this, and leads
> one to believe that an apex A RR at doubleclick.net would have an effect.
Depends what you are trying to
Paul Vixie wrote:
on the other hand, if you do this for a nameserver that your customers
depend on, then there is probably some liability for either trademark
infringement, tortious interference with prospective economic advantage,
and the gods alone know what else. if you do this, keep it to a s
> > ... what hosts to list??? (ie: ad2, ad3 ... to ad???)
>
> Been fixing that for a good 6 years now. Just setup your local name
> servers to be authoritative for doubleclick.net and don't put any A
> records in the file. Works like a charm. ;-)
on the one hand, you'd need a wildcard A RR at *.
On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 18:21, John Palmer wrote:
>
> Now the question is, can one easily block all of doubleclick.net by 127.0.0.1 in the
> hosts file
> on a wincrash box? They appear to have ad, ad2, ad3, m2, m3.doubleclick.net. Anyone
> know
> what hosts to list??? (ie: ad2, ad3 ... to ad???)
I got my list from somewhere else, but lost the link. Try:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=hosts+ad+blocking+servers&btnG=Google+Search
Lot's there.
JMH
John Palmer wrote:
Now the question is, can one easily block all of doubleclick.net by 127.0.0.1 in the
hosts file
on a wincrash b
neweh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sean Donelan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 17:10
Subject: Re: ad.doubleclick.net missing from DNS?
>
> While I disagree with the method of the attacker, I
> can understand the reasoning beh
While I disagree with the method of the attacker, I
can understand the reasoning behind an attack on a
company that is considered a spyware company,
doubleclick certainly has turned up more than once on
my version of spybot as a site to block.
-Henry
--- Sean Donelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A18735-2004Jul27.html
DoubleClick spokeswoman Jennifer Blum said the attack targeted the
company's domain name servers (DNS) -- machines that help direct
Internet traffic -- causing "severe service disruptions" for all 900 of
its customers. Bl
Sean Donelan([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2004.07.27 12:34:04 +:
> The A record for ad.doubleclick.net is missing from DNS. This is
> causing apparent web page slowdowns when viewing web sites containing ads
> linked to ad.doubleclick.net
Short remedy recipee:
- Download Firefox -> http://www.mozilla.
Stephen Stuart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Better still, run an http listener on (for example) 127.0.0.2 port
> 80, using the appropriate /etc/hosts glue to map whatever hostnames
> you like to that address, and answer requests with null content; the
> remainder of the page will complete fa
Once upon a time, Sean Donelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> The A record for ad.doubleclick.net is missing from DNS. This is
> causing apparent web page slowdowns when viewing web sites containing ads
> linked to ad.doubleclick.net
It looks like the problem isn't that the A record is missing, it
> Adding an entry in LMHOSTS or /etc/hosts pointing ad.doubleclick.net
> to 127.0.0.1 is generally a good idea, especially if you value your
> privacy.
Better still, run an http listener on (for example) 127.0.0.2 port 80,
using the appropriate /etc/hosts glue to map whatever hostnames you
like t
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 12:34:04PM -0400, Sean Donelan wrote:
>
>
> The A record for ad.doubleclick.net is missing from DNS. This is
> causing apparent web page slowdowns when viewing web sites containing ads
> linked to ad.doubleclick.net
Actually, it appears to me that all of dclk's nam
Sounds neat idea, worth giving a try.
Mehmet Akcin
www.akcin.net
-Özgün İleti-
Kimden: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Yerine Ricardo
"Rick" Gonzalez
Tarih: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 7:59 PM
Kime: Sean Donelan
Bilgi: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Konu: Re: ad.doubleclick.net mi
> The A record for ad.doubleclick.net is missing from DNS. This is
> causing apparent web page slowdowns when viewing web sites containing ads
> linked to ad.doubleclick.net
Adding an entry in LMHOSTS or /etc/hosts pointing ad.doubleclick.net
to 127.0.0.1 is generally a good idea, especially if
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 27 11:37:36 2004
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:34:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sean Donelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ad.doubleclick.net missing from DNS?
The A record for ad.doubleclick.net is missing from DNS. This is
causing apparent
The A record for ad.doubleclick.net is missing from DNS. This is
causing apparent web page slowdowns when viewing web sites containing ads
linked to ad.doubleclick.net
20 matches
Mail list logo
