On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephane Bortzmeyer) wrote:
>
> > It is not easy to find by itself (you have to do a lot of traceroutes)
> > so, if you have access to this information, it would be quite useful.
> >
> > (I'm one of the persons who see a lot of ji
> > as far as i know, the root-servers.org web site is 100% accurate,
>
> Following the recent discussion about "anycast jitter" with
> j.root-servers.net, I believe one information is missing: wether the
> node is global or local (BGP NO_EXPORT).
note that BGP NO_EXPORT is but one of several w
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 10:05:20AM -0500,
Joe Abley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 36 lines which said:
> I have no idea about Verisign's scheme, but in case anybody notices
> similar distribution of queries across F root servers, it may help to
> know that:
>
> xxxNa.f.root-server
On 17 Nov 2004, at 08:37, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
in alternating fashion, but I would assume "jns1" through "jns6" are
just the individual servers of a setup called "hgtld".
I have no idea about Verisign's scheme, but in case anybody notices
similar distribution of queries across F root servers, it
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 02:37:25PM +0100,
Elmar K. Bins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 34 lines which said:
> in alternating fashion, but I would assume "jns1" through "jns6" are
> just the individual servers of a setup called "hgtld".
That's a reasonable guess. Someone from Verisign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephane Bortzmeyer) wrote:
> It is not easy to find by itself (you have to do a lot of traceroutes)
> so, if you have access to this information, it would be quite useful.
>
> (I'm one of the persons who see a lot of jitter for
> j.root-servers.net with Randy Bush's experimen
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:00:54PM +,
Paul Vixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 18 lines which said:
> as far as i know, the root-servers.org web site is 100% accurate,
Following the recent discussion about "anycast jitter" with
j.root-servers.net, I believe one information is mi
Paul Vixie wrote (responding to Bill Manning):
... The public data about "B"
on that site is not 100% accurate and does not have 100% participation
amoungst root-server operators wrt publishing accurate information.
you've got root on that web server. if you want something removed, you c
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> I think it is time to update rfc2870 and add a few new MUST paragraphs :-)
Do you want a refund on your root-server bill?
Randy,
I think it is time to update rfc2870 and add a few new MUST paragraphs :-)
-Hank
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> > root-servers.org is not definative. why do you think it is?
>
> because the community expects the root server ops to be
> helpful, open, honest, and transparent.
> root-servers.org is not definative. why do you think it is?
because the community expects the root server ops to be
helpful, open, honest, and transparent. you know, all that
service to the community stuff. damned shame not all seem
to be.
randy
And we, the users, appreciate the info being kept up to date.
Thanks for the work,
-Hank
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >
> > > > for those nodes that choose to use root-servers.org as a
> > > > publication method, ...
> > > >
> > >
> > >as far as i know, the root-servers.org we
At 04:25 AM 13-11-04 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:00:54PM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > for those nodes that choose to use root-servers.org as a
> > publication method, ...
> >
>
> as far as i know, the root-servers.org web site
> please remove all public informtion about "B" from
> http://www.root-servers.org. The public data about "B"
> on that site is not 100% accurate and does not have 100% participation
> amoungst root-server operators wrt publishing accurate information.
you've got root o
> i'm saying that there is no place that is public that
> has connectivity information for all instances of the
> "B" servers.
considering, do we care? i sure don't.
randy
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:00:54PM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > for those nodes that choose to use root-servers.org as a
> > publication method, ...
> >
>
> as far as i know, the root-servers.org web site is 100% accurate, and has
> 100% participation amo
vember 12, 2004 7:19 AM
> > To: Andrei Robachevsky
> > Cc: Elmar K. Bins; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: anycast roots
> >
> >
> > > Helsinki (FI); Geneva (CH). www.root-servers.org is up to date.
> >
> > for those nodes that choose
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> for those nodes that choose to use root-servers.org as a
> publication method, ...
>
as far as i know, the root-servers.org web site is 100% accurate, and has
100% participation amongst root server operators wrt publishing accurate
information. if bill kn
> Don't presume to speak for the other operators please.
got a mirror around the house?
Bill,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Helsinki (FI); Geneva (CH). www.root-servers.org is up to date.
for those nodes that choose to use root-servers.org as a publication
method, that might be true. I take your note to mean that
www.root-servers.org
is up to date wrt the publica
operators.
Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 7:19 AM
> To: Andrei Robachevsky
> Cc: Elmar K. Bins; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: anycast roots
>
>
> Helsinki (FI); Geneva (CH). www.root-servers.org is up to date.
for those nodes that choose to use root-servers.org as a publication
method, that might be true. I take your note to mean that
www.root-servers.org
is up to date wrt the publication of deployed sites for t
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 07:30:58AM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>
> > > > which roots are anycast? c f i j k?
> > > b m
> >
> > g
>
> Not according to http://root-servers.org. Hiding the places?
>
> -Hank
root-servers.org is not definative. why do you think it is?
--bill
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 07:30:00AM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>
> > > which roots are anycast? c f i j k?
> >
> > b m
> >
> > - - kurtis -
>
> According to http://root-servers.org only m is.
>
> -Hank
root-servers.org does not representevery root-server
operator.
--bill
Elmar K. Bins wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kurt Erik Lindqvist) wrote:
On 2004-11-12, at 02.53, Randy Bush wrote:
which roots are anycast? c f i j k?
b m
k (London, Amsterdam, Frankfurt)
K is also in Athens (GR); Doha (QA); Milan (IT); Reykjavik (IS);
Helsinki (FI); Geneva (CH). www.root-servers.o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kurt Erik Lindqvist) wrote:
> On 2004-11-12, at 02.53, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> > which roots are anycast? c f i j k?
> b m
k (London, Amsterdam, Frankfurt)
Elmar.
--
"Begehe nur nicht den Fehler, Meinung durch Sachverstand zu substituieren."
(PLemke
> which are widely anycast, i.e. at more than three or four
> locations OR on three or more continents?
3 or more continents: that would be f i and j
-Hank
>
> randy
> > > which roots are anycast? c f i j k?
> > b m
>
> g
Not according to http://root-servers.org. Hiding the places?
-Hank
> > which roots are anycast? c f i j k?
>
> b m
>
> - - kurtis -
According to http://root-servers.org only m is.
-Hank
> and the good folks on nanog would know this why?
dunno, bill. maybe because it has to do with network operations?
but we did get the answers we needed, thanks to some of those good
folk. and non-answers from others. all as expected. welcome to
the internet.
randy
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 06:03:42PM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> >> which roots are anycast? c f i j k?
> > b m
>
> thanks.
>
> which are widely anycast, i.e. at more than three or four
> locations OR on three or more continents?
>
> randy
and the good folks on nanog would know this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2004-11-12, at 03.03, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> which roots are anycast? c f i j k?
>> b m
>
> thanks.
>
> which are widely anycast, i.e. at more than three or four
> locations OR on three or more continents?
I think that http://root-servers.org is
>> which roots are anycast? c f i j k?
> b m
thanks.
which are widely anycast, i.e. at more than three or four
locations OR on three or more continents?
randy
> > which roots are anycast? c f i j k?
> b m
g
-Bill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2004-11-12, at 02.53, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> which roots are anycast? c f i j k?
b m
- - kurtis -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 8.1
iQA/AwUBQZQYaqarNKXTPFCVEQJcDACeMo3bNr6oOIRx69IvmCdMv/Xe3l0AnA4d
QdMSlL6vKhLe3xqRKkAf3LfV
=LN6i
-
which roots are anycast? c f i j k?
randy
36 matches
Mail list logo
