[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Vixie) writes:
> in the example i posted earlier, i included some numbers from one member of
> the "f troop", which showed ~21M packets from rfc1918 space over the course
> of ~106 days. that's 241 queries per second. on only one host of many.
> granted it's not much as
On Aug 18, 2004, at 6:46 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 06:12:38PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
Anyone that isn't working on this (even slowly) is helping
contribute to part of the problem/mess of rfc1918 sourced packets
leaking
to the internet.
Tell it to the unfortunate n
> > > > Is it really enough traffic that you, as a root server operator,
> > > > can't just suck it up and deal? Sure there are going to be a few
> > > > folks who are misconfigured, but I can't imagine that it is enough
> > > > to cause operational issues.
a few folks? no. if it was a few pack
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 06:12:38PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> Anyone that isn't working on this (even slowly) is helping
> contribute to part of the problem/mess of rfc1918 sourced packets leaking
> to the internet.
Tell it to the unfortunate number of people manufacturing customer edge
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 05:31:47PM -0400, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 02:18:32PM -0700, David A. Ulevitch wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Is it really enough traffic that you, as a root server operator, can't
> > > just suck it up and deal? Sure there are going to be
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 02:18:32PM -0700, David A. Ulevitch wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > Is it really enough traffic that you, as a root server operator, can't
> > just suck it up and deal? Sure there are going to be a few folks who are
> > misconfigured, but I can't imagine that it is enough to cause o
> Is it really enough traffic that you, as a root server operator, can't
> just suck it up and deal? Sure there are going to be a few folks who are
> misconfigured, but I can't imagine that it is enough to cause operational
> issues.
No, no operational issues at all from RFC1918 space
htt
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 07:57:53PM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> this seems excessive, and so i've been assuming that it was all vijay's
> fault. but apparently it's not him. so which one of you isn't filtering
> 1918 at your edge? (oops, it's all of you, isn't it?)
Is it really enough traffic
> That said, I do filter 1918 at my edge.
>
> /vijay
ok everybody, vijay says the snapshot below didn't come from him.
who wants to claim it, then?
# tcpdump -n -c 25 net 10 or net 192.168 or net 172.16.0.0/12
tcpdump: listening on fxp0
19:52:53.787244 10.9.10.250.53 > 192.5.5.241.53: 29644 MX
