On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 05:24:46PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[snip]
> It would be easier to troubleshoot if you used a browser that returned
> a meaningful error message. "The page could not be found" could be just
> about anything. DNS, routing, broken link, etc.
> ---
> vickyr>
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003, Jay Hennigan wrote:
> The rogue proxy servers are apparently a man-in-the-middle password sniffer
> of some type affecting at a minimum HTTP and SSH.
>
> http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/06/19/2325235&mode=thread&tid=126
I'm not going to defend ISP security practices
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jay Hennigan) writes:
> Is Time-Warner associated with Charter Communications? There's a thread
> on Slashdot about their name servers being hijacked to point all requests
> to a set of rogue proxy servers.
s/name/dhcp/. specifically, the article states:
Of course,
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003, Vicky Rode wrote:
> If a whole bunch of people are having the same issue and they're all on
> Time Warner in your neck of the woods, it probably isn't the cable modem
> hardware.
> ---
> vickyr> exactly my point.
Is Time-Warner associated with Charter Co
Hi Jay,
comments in-line:
-Original Message-
From: Jay Hennigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 10:22 PM
To: Vicky Rode
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: has anyone notice this ?
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Vicky Rode wrote:
> It would be easier to troubleshoot
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 7:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'David A. Ulevitch'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: has anyone notice this ?
Have you tried using DNS servers other than the ones supplied by your
ISPs DHCP server?
Todd
--
| -Original Message--
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Vicky Rode wrote:
> It would be easier to troubleshoot if you used a browser that returned
> a meaningful error message. "The page could not be found" could be just
> about anything. DNS, routing, broken link, etc.
> ---
> vickyr> i even tried the same thing und
]
| Subject: RE: has anyone notice this ?
|
|
| Hi David,
|
| i'm just couple feet away from my box. i'm currently using wireless
and
| even
| tried wired with same results. the fact others are experiencing
similar
| problems makes me believe the problem could be on time warner end,
| possible
al Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
David A. Ulevitch
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 6:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: has anyone notice this ?
> vickyr> i'm a time warner end-user trying to access outside world
> which could be any
> vickyr> i'm a time warner end-user trying to access outside world
> which could be anything.
[SNIP]
> vickyr> yes i have and they think it could be the cable modem box
> and have issued a replacement. i sure hope they have a good stock
> because i know whole bunch of people who are having s
Hi Jay,
see comments in-line:
-Original Message-
From: Jay Hennigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 4:09 PM
To: Vicky Rode
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: has anyone notice this ?
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Vicky Rode wrote:
> just wondering has anyone noti
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Vicky Rode wrote:
> just wondering has anyone noticed http access issue ("the page cannot be
> displayed") on time warner network ? i literally have to try 5 to 6 times to
> get to the page. i believe this problem just started a week or so back.
It would be easier to trouble
howdy folks,
just wondering has anyone noticed http access issue ("the page cannot be
displayed") on time warner network ? i literally have to try 5 to 6 times to
get to the page. i believe this problem just started a week or so back.
i've even talked to few other people on socal.rr.com network
13 matches
Mail list logo
