Re: i wanna be a kpn peer

2007-01-12 Thread David Freedman
Randy Bush wrote: route-views.oregon-ix.net>sh ip bg 203.10.63.0 BGP routing table entry for 0.0.0.0/, version 2 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Not advertised to any peer 286 134.222.85.45 from 134.222.85.45 (134.222.85.45) Origin IGP, localpref 100,

Re: i wanna be a kpn peer

2007-01-11 Thread Niels Bakker
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randy Bush) [Thu 11 Jan 2007, 04:36 CET]: route-views.oregon-ix.net>sh ip bg 203.10.63.0 BGP routing table entry for 0.0.0.0/, version 2 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Not advertised to any peer 286 134.222.85.45 from 134.222.85.45 (134.22

Re: i wanna be a kpn peer

2007-01-10 Thread Alexander Koch
On Thu, 11 January 2007 03:54:23 +, Chris L. Morrow wrote: > do most folks setup route-views peers as a 'standard customer' or are they > generally on a special purpose box with special (easy to forget about and > screw up) box? Chris, I'd rather say one should be setting up a normal 'full fe

Re: i wanna be a kpn peer

2007-01-10 Thread Patrick W. Gilmore
On Jan 10, 2007, at 11:28 PM, Randy Bush wrote: I don't think a spurious prefix directly injected into route-views is proof a network is broken. we've had this discussion 42 times. it is not proof of anything and no one has said it is. but if it was one of my areas of responsibility leak

Re: i wanna be a kpn peer

2007-01-10 Thread Randy Bush
> I don't think a spurious prefix directly injected into route-views is > proof a network is broken. we've had this discussion 42 times. it is not proof of anything and no one has said it is. but if it was one of my areas of responsibility leaking something strange, i sure would not mind folk m

Re: i wanna be a kpn peer

2007-01-10 Thread Patrick W. Gilmore
On Jan 10, 2007, at 10:54 PM, Chris L. Morrow wrote: On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Randy Bush wrote: route-views.oregon-ix.net>sh ip bg 203.10.63.0 BGP routing table entry for 0.0.0.0/, version 2 do most folks setup route-views peers as a 'standard customer' or are they generally on a special purpo

Re: i wanna be a kpn peer

2007-01-10 Thread Chris L. Morrow
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Randy Bush wrote: > > route-views.oregon-ix.net>sh ip bg 203.10.63.0 > BGP routing table entry for 0.0.0.0/, version 2 do most folks setup route-views peers as a 'standard customer' or are they generally on a special purpose box with special (easy to forget about and screw

Re: i wanna be a kpn peer

2007-01-10 Thread Robert Boyle
At 10:29 PM 1/10/2007, you wrote: route-views.oregon-ix.net>sh ip bg 203.10.63.0 BGP routing table entry for 0.0.0.0/, version 2 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Not advertised to any peer 286 134.222.85.45 from 134.222.85.45 (134.222.85.45) Origin IGP,

i wanna be a kpn peer

2007-01-10 Thread Randy Bush
route-views.oregon-ix.net>sh ip bg 203.10.63.0 BGP routing table entry for 0.0.0.0/, version 2 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Not advertised to any peer 286 134.222.85.45 from 134.222.85.45 (134.222.85.45) Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external, bes