Randy Bush wrote:
route-views.oregon-ix.net>sh ip bg 203.10.63.0
BGP routing table entry for 0.0.0.0/, version 2
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Not advertised to any peer
286
134.222.85.45 from 134.222.85.45 (134.222.85.45)
Origin IGP, localpref 100,
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randy Bush) [Thu 11 Jan 2007, 04:36 CET]:
route-views.oregon-ix.net>sh ip bg 203.10.63.0
BGP routing table entry for 0.0.0.0/, version 2
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Not advertised to any peer
286
134.222.85.45 from 134.222.85.45 (134.22
On Thu, 11 January 2007 03:54:23 +, Chris L. Morrow wrote:
> do most folks setup route-views peers as a 'standard customer' or are they
> generally on a special purpose box with special (easy to forget about and
> screw up) box?
Chris, I'd rather say one should be setting up a normal
'full fe
On Jan 10, 2007, at 11:28 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
I don't think a spurious prefix directly injected into route-views is
proof a network is broken.
we've had this discussion 42 times. it is not proof of anything
and no
one has said it is. but if it was one of my areas of responsibility
leak
> I don't think a spurious prefix directly injected into route-views is
> proof a network is broken.
we've had this discussion 42 times. it is not proof of anything and no
one has said it is. but if it was one of my areas of responsibility
leaking something strange, i sure would not mind folk m
On Jan 10, 2007, at 10:54 PM, Chris L. Morrow wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Randy Bush wrote:
route-views.oregon-ix.net>sh ip bg 203.10.63.0
BGP routing table entry for 0.0.0.0/, version 2
do most folks setup route-views peers as a 'standard customer' or
are they
generally on a special purpo
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> route-views.oregon-ix.net>sh ip bg 203.10.63.0
> BGP routing table entry for 0.0.0.0/, version 2
do most folks setup route-views peers as a 'standard customer' or are they
generally on a special purpose box with special (easy to forget about and
screw
At 10:29 PM 1/10/2007, you wrote:
route-views.oregon-ix.net>sh ip bg 203.10.63.0
BGP routing table entry for 0.0.0.0/, version 2
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Not advertised to any peer
286
134.222.85.45 from 134.222.85.45 (134.222.85.45)
Origin IGP,
route-views.oregon-ix.net>sh ip bg 203.10.63.0
BGP routing table entry for 0.0.0.0/, version 2
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Not advertised to any peer
286
134.222.85.45 from 134.222.85.45 (134.222.85.45)
Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external, bes