## On 2002-04-12 17:27 -0700 Mark Kent typed: MK> MK> To address Sean's point about mistakes turning one /16 into a zillion MK> entries, is there any way to allow only some specified maximum number MK> of routes from a bgp neighbor? I know that I'ld be happy if my MK> upstreams gave me a buffer of, say, 10 entries above my typical number MK> of aggregates. MK> MK> -mark MK> MK> For Cisco IOS just add this under the "router bgp" section --- neighbor <IP address> maximum-prefix <nnnn> --- Exceeding the maximum prefix number will shutdown the BGP session until a manual clear Enjoy Rafi -- Rafi Sadowsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network/System/Security VoiceMail: +972-3-646-0592 FAX: +972-3-649-8629 Mangler ( :-) | FIRST-REP for ILAN-CERT([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Open University of Israel | (PGP key -> ) http://telem.openu.ac.il/~rafi
- Re: genuity - any good? Simon Lyall
- Re: genuity - any good? Stephen Griffin
- Re: genuity - any good? Roy
- Re: genuity - any good? Aditya
- Re: genuity - any good? Sean Donelan
- Re: genuity - any good? David Schwartz
- Re: genuity - any good? Richard A Steenbergen
- Re: genuity - any good? Mark Kent
- Route Filtering (Was: Re: genuity -... Leo Bicknell
- RE: genuity - any good? David Luyer
- Re: limiting # of prefixes from a B... Rafi Sadowsky
- Re: limiting # of prefixes fro... German Martinez
- Re: genuity - any good? Stephen Griffin
- Re: genuity - any good? Eric Whitehill
- Re: genuity - any good? Richard A Steenbergen
- Re: genuity - any good? Adam Rothschild
- Re: genuity - any good? matthew zeier
- RE: genuity - any good? Kris Foster
- RE: genuity - any good? Kris Foster
- RE: genuity - any good? Stephen J. Wilcox
- Re: genuity - any good? Jesper Skriver