On Tuesday 07 Feb 2006 22:08, Florian Weimer wrote:
As far as I can tell, the filters at AOL are far less problematic than
crude filters at smaller sites which simply use SORBS or
bl.spamcop.net.
Not here, no one cares if some small bit player has stupid filters, but when a
significant
* Randy Bush:
so, anyone working on the majordomo and mailman hacks for goodmail?
i am sorry, but you can not subscribe to this list from an aol.com
address. don't ask us to explain, ask [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or am i missing something here? clue-bat if so, please.
I don't expect the existing
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Randy Bush
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 10:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ml hacks for goodmail
so, anyone working on the majordomo and mailman hacks for goodmail?
i am sorry, but you can not subscribe to this list from an aol.com
address. don't
so, anyone working on the majordomo and mailman hacks for goodmail?
i am sorry, but you can not subscribe to this list from an aol.com
address. don't ask us to explain, ask [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or am i missing something here? clue-bat if so, please.
randy
On 2/5/06, Randy Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so, anyone working on the majordomo and mailman hacks for goodmail?
i am sorry, but you can not subscribe to this list from an aol.com
address. don't ask us to explain, ask [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or am i missing something here? clue-bat if so,
Goodmail seems to be for transactional email. AKA bank and credit card
statements for example. And for content rich email (html, with lots
of cute pictures)
You sending any of that?
dunno what 3/4 of the mailing lists hosted here contain. i can
certainly imagine mailing lists for lovers
On 2/5/06, Randy Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dunno what 3/4 of the mailing lists hosted here contain. i can
certainly imagine mailing lists for lovers of pictures of cute
(and, for equal rights, not so cute) hamsters. do i care?
Even those would be just fine with what exists currently
