Stephen Wilcox wrote:
On 17 Oct 2007, at 20:55, Bradley Urberg Carlson wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions.
On Oct 17, 2007, at 6:06 PM, Stephen Wilcox wrote:
well.. the problem of course is that you pull in the traffic from the
aggregate transit prefix which costs you $$$ but then you
On 17 Oct 2007, at 20:55, Bradley Urberg Carlson wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions.
On Oct 17, 2007, at 6:06 PM, Stephen Wilcox wrote:
well.. the problem of course is that you pull in the traffic from
the aggregate transit prefix which costs you $$$ but then you
offload it to the custome
Thanks for the suggestions.
On Oct 17, 2007, at 6:06 PM, Stephen Wilcox wrote:
well.. the problem of course is that you pull in the traffic from the
aggregate transit prefix which costs you $$$ but then you offload it
to the customer via a peering link for which you are not being paid
A bigg
On 15 Oct 2007, at 03:49, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 15-okt-2007, at 7:09, Bradley Urberg Carlson wrote:
There is a customer's customer who is advertising more-specifics
at the IX (and using a different source AS, to boot). I can think
of a couple ways to prevent hearing these, but
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/15/2007 01:09:08 AM:
>
> I have a few customers' customers, who appear at a local IX. Due to
> the MLPA-like nature of the IX, I hear their prefixes both at the IX
> and via my own transit customers. I normally use localpref to prefer
> customer advertisements o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bradley Urberg Carlson wrote:
>
> I have a few customers' customers, who appear at a local IX. Due to the
> MLPA-like nature of the IX, I hear their prefixes both at the IX and via
> my own transit customers. I normally use localpref to prefer cust
On Oct 15, 2007, at 9:48 AM, Mike Leber wrote:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Bradley Urberg Carlson wrote:
I have a few customers' customers, who appear at a local IX. Due to
the MLPA-like nature of the IX, I hear their prefixes both at the IX
and via my own transit customers. I normally use local
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Bradley Urberg Carlson wrote:
> I have a few customers' customers, who appear at a local IX. Due to
> the MLPA-like nature of the IX, I hear their prefixes both at the IX
> and via my own transit customers. I normally use localpref to prefer
> customer advertisements ove
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007, Wolfgang Tremmel wrote:
> >I have a few customers' customers, who appear at a local IX. Due
> >to the MLPA-like nature of the IX, I hear their prefixes both at
> >the IX and via my own transit customers. I normally use localpref
> >to prefer customer advertisements o
On 15 Oct 2007, at 13:33, John Payne wrote:
To answer the OP's question I'd be looking at manually filtering
the more specifics if they are also sending the aggregates through
the IX.
The customer's customer is still going to see *your* routes via the
MLP, unless (without knowing what e
The problem is you're announcing the aggregate prefixes of your customer's
customers to your upstream providers and the traffic from your upstreams to
those networks will be routed through the IX (instead of your customer
connection) because of the longer prefix effect and so you're not charging
th
On Oct 15, 2007, at 7:41, Wolfgang Tremmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cix.net> wrote:
Am 15.10.2007 um 07:09 schrieb Bradley Urberg Carlson:
I have a few customers' customers, who appear at a local IX. Due
to the MLPA-like nature of the IX, I hear their prefixes both at
the IX and via my
Am 15.10.2007 um 07:09 schrieb Bradley Urberg Carlson:
I have a few customers' customers, who appear at a local IX. Due
to the MLPA-like nature of the IX, I hear their prefixes both at
the IX and via my own transit customers. I normally use localpref
to prefer customer advertisements o
On 15-okt-2007, at 7:09, Bradley Urberg Carlson wrote:
There is a customer's customer who is advertising more-specifics at
the IX (and using a different source AS, to boot). I can think of
a couple ways to prevent hearing these, but thought I should ask
for suggestions first.
What exact
I have a few customers' customers, who appear at a local IX. Due to
the MLPA-like nature of the IX, I hear their prefixes both at the IX
and via my own transit customers. I normally use localpref to prefer
customer advertisements over peers' advertisements.
There is a customer's customer w
15 matches
Mail list logo
