On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Fred Baker wrote:
I still think IP+timestamp doesn't imply what person did something
it doesn't, no any more than the association of your cell phone with a cell
tower conclusively implies that the owner of a telephone used it to do
something in particular. However, in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- Gadi Evron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Security is a strong supporter of privacy as much as it is misused
as an excuse for infringing upon it.
Very well stated. I agree completely.
Considering possibilities, other than avoiding spoofing, what
Security is a strong supporter of privacy ...
I've removed the part of this sentence I don't understand.
Privacy involves more than just non-disclosure, it also involves issues
like identifiable retention
and identifiable 3rd-party provisioning and identifiable other-policy
collection
