You can easily repeat the queries on the bgpinspect website to generate
the same results in html files. I just bundled them up into a
single pdf for convenience.
thanks
manish
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Fergie wrote:
Out of curiousity, why must these be in .pdf format?
I mean, what's wrong wi
Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:25:58 -0500 (EST)
From: Manish Karir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: oof. panix sidelined by incompetence... again.
in case some people want to look at routeviews data for themselves,
I have archived a couple of pd
in case some people want to look at routeviews data for themselves,
I have archived a couple of pdf file at:
http://bgpinspect.merit.edu/reports.php
-manish
-
Re: oof. panix sidelined by incompetence... again.
* From: william(at)elan.net
* Date: Sun Jan 22 13:34:47 2006
Can
> As of the now (according to Panix; I haven't independantly verified
> it), Verio is (at Panix's request) rejecting the route from ConEd, and
> Panix's upstreams are accepting the /17s, so connectivity should be
> OK from everywhere except possibly ConEd.
are the following two statements true?
Folx,
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 06:09:08PM +, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> This is hardly as serious as the last incident -- but, well, some people
> do seem to have all the luck, eh?
>From where I'm standing this situation looks much more serious than
the last one. It looks like Con Edison
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:33:04AM -0800, william(at)elan.net wrote:
>
> Can there be a confirmation of this? I see no such MOTD at
> http://www.panix.com/panix/help/Announcements/
I don't know how realtime that is ... but Panix (including their web
site) was unreachable from several points ear
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:33:04AM -0800, william(at)elan.net wrote:
>
>
> Can there be a confirmation of this? I see no such MOTD at
> http://www.panix.com/panix/help/Announcements/
Verio was just extremely helpful and filtered out the bogus Panix
routes ConED was sending them quite rapidly u
Can there be a confirmation of this? I see no such MOTD at
http://www.panix.com/panix/help/Announcements/
and my connection to panix is fine and route I see is 166.84.0.0/17
with origin in 2033. I also checked at routeviews.org and similarly
all their peers see origin in in 2033. Is there some
This is hardly as serious as the last incident -- but, well, some people
do seem to have all the luck, eh?
Of course, there are measures one can take against this sort of thing; but
it's hard to deploy some of them effectively when the party stealing your
routes was in fact once authorized to of