ng problems reaching microsoft??
>
> regards,
>
> Arjan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: maandag 23 februari 2004 23:53
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: possible L3 iss
Using their own looking glass (lg.level3.net) produces all sorts
of route failures as well.
Show Level 3 (Raleigh, NC) Traceroute to so-3-3-0.edge1.SanJose1.Level3.net
(4.68.127.29)
1 ge-7-0-0.mpls1.Raleigh1.Level3.net (209.244.22.33) 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec
2 so-5-1-0.bbr1.Atlanta1.Level3.net
RanchSent:
Monday, February 23, 2004 5:00 PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: possible L3 issues
Definite failures in South East US. I have a dead
OC-3.
Chris
> -Original Message- >
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of &g
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Will Orton wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 05:53:10PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > anyone else seeing high latency via L3 , especially the west coast ?
> > - Keith
>
> Yes, I'm able to get the usual full view from them (I'm a customer) but as soon as I
> send
> a
Hi!
> Here at planet (AS8737) we also having problems reaching
> msn/hotmail/messenger.
>
> Seems that C&W are also having problems reaching microsoft??
> anyone else seeing high latency via L3 , especially the west coast ?
> - Keith
Same here, but also seeing a pretty loaded Telefonica peerin
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 02:58:40PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> Level3 is having problems in SJC and ATL right now and they are definitely
> aware of it. Any packets that I send to them die at their ipcolo switch in
> those two markets.
>
> Level3 in LAX, DFW, CHI, DC, NYC, SEA, DEN all
On Feb 23, 2004, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
>
>
> And is it related to Telefonica leaking their peer routes to their
> transits, which seems to have happened at around the same time? :)
>
I did see only one session with L3 reaching our max-pref limit.
--
"Discouragement is an enemy of yo
2004 23:53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: possible L3 issues
anyone else seeing high latency via L3 , especially the west coast ?
- Keith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yo Keith!
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> anyone else seeing high latency via L3 , especially the west coast ?
They started blocking my ping monitors in the last 15 minutes. So my
Nagios is going nuts. Otherwise TCP seem OK. Maybe
thanks all, finally got through to the NOC. It will be intersting to see
what the real cause turns out to be..
-Original Message-
From: Andy Naylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 12:57 AM
To: Wallace Keith
Subject: Re: possible L3 issues
L3 is having system
2004 23:53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: possible L3 issues
anyone else seeing high latency via L3 , especially the west coast ?
- Keith
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 05:53:10PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> anyone else seeing high latency via L3 , especially the west coast ?
> - Keith
Yes, I'm able to get the usual full view from them (I'm a customer) but as soon as I
send
any traffic their way it dies at the first hop into their
age-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 2:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: possible L3 issues
>
>
> anyone else seeing high latency via L3 , especially the west coast ?
> - Keith
>
>
Title: RE: possible L3 issues
Definite failures in South East US. I have a dead OC-3.
Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 2:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTE
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 05:53:10PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> anyone else seeing high latency via L3 , especially the west coast ?
And is it related to Telefonica leaking their peer routes to their
transits, which seems to have happened at around the same time? :)
--
Richard A Steenb
anyone else seeing high latency via L3 , especially the west coast ?
- Keith
16 matches
Mail list logo