Re: rDNS naming conventions (was: Re: SORBS Contact)

2006-08-10 Thread Nicholas Suan
On 8/10/06, Steven Champeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: on Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 08:55:37PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > There's at least one vietnamese ISP that has / had till recently set > "localhost" as rDNS for all their IPs. IIRC, that was fpt.vn; they replaced 'localhost' with t

Re: rDNS naming conventions (was: Re: SORBS Contact)

2006-08-10 Thread Steven Champeon
on Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 08:55:37PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > > On 8/10/06, Steven Champeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >redundancy "bigisp-foo-bar-baz.dyn.bigisp.net". Worst among those who > >actually provide rDNS in SE Asia is probably tm.net.my, who name all of > >their customer

Re: rDNS naming conventions (was: Re: SORBS Contact)

2006-08-10 Thread Edward Lewis
At 15:47 + 8/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:21:45AM -0400, Steven Champeon wrote: on Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 01:11:50AM -0700, william(at)elan.net wrote: > >>On Aug 9, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Matthew Sullivan wrote: > >>>

Re: rDNS naming conventions (was: Re: SORBS Contact)

2006-08-10 Thread bmanning
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:21:45AM -0400, Steven Champeon wrote: > > on Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 01:11:50AM -0700, william(at)elan.net wrote: > > > > > > >>On Aug 9, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Matthew Sullivan wrote: > > >> > > >>>This is also why I took the time to create: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>

Re: rDNS naming conventions (was: Re: SORBS Contact)

2006-08-10 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
On 8/10/06, Steven Champeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: redundancy "bigisp-foo-bar-baz.dyn.bigisp.net". Worst among those who actually provide rDNS in SE Asia is probably tm.net.my, who name all of their customer PTRs 'tm.net.my'. Hm. Maybe encoding the IP in the PTR There's at least one vietna

rDNS naming conventions (was: Re: SORBS Contact)

2006-08-10 Thread Steven Champeon
on Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 01:11:50AM -0700, william(at)elan.net wrote: > > > >>On Aug 9, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Matthew Sullivan wrote: > >> > >>>This is also why I took the time to create: > >>> > >>> > >>> >