On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 12:41:23 EDT, Ted Fischer said:
> >Go read this: http://65.246.255.51/rfc/rfc3675.txt
> >
> >And ask yourself (a) why did that URL work at all, and (b) whether censoring
> >via top-level domain is likely to work.
>
> As an interesting side note, my e-mail client (Eudora) h
At 11:28 AM 7/3/2005, Valdis Kletnieks wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 09:44:56 +0200, Peter Dambier said:
> http://xn--8pru44h.xn--55qx5d/
>
> Try to see their homepage!
I can't help it if they disregard RFC2826...
> ICANN does not want them.
> They dont want ICANN either.
This doesn't change t
On Jul 3, 2005, at 5:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 09:44:56 +0200, Peter Dambier said:
http://xn--8pru44h.xn--55qx5d/
Try to see their homepage!
I can't help it if they disregard RFC2826...
we talk about controlling nameservers right?
So why should they care abo
On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 09:44:56 +0200, Peter Dambier said:
> http://xn--8pru44h.xn--55qx5d/
>
> Try to see their homepage!
I can't help it if they disregard RFC2826...
> ICANN does not want them.
> They dont want ICANN either.
This doesn't change the technical issues in rfc2826.
> European ISPs
Peter Dambier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> European ISPs and Asian ISPs do change to the Public-Root because their
> customers need to send emails to each other. Curiously enough their is
> no SPAM on Public-Root email addresses. I thought the spammers were
> located in Asia and Europe only?
C
On 03/07/05, Peter Dambier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://xn--8pru44h.xn--55qx5d/
>
> Try to see their homepage!
I cant.
> You dont do bussiness with them?
> But you are wearing their shoes.
> And who controls ICANN? I am afraid they are out of control - reading
> their mailing lists a
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On 03/07/05, John Palmer (NANOG Acct) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Already entire nations are dropping ICANN. China for one and now
Turkey.
You know something .. the turks, or at least one minor government /
industry department there, seem to have been drinking
On 03/07/05, John Palmer (NANOG Acct) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Already entire nations are dropping ICANN. China for one and now
> Turkey.
>
You know something .. the turks, or at least one minor government /
industry department there, seem to have been drinking the public root
koolaid.
>
access full article)
- Original Message -
From: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John Levine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2005 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: NTIA will control t
On 2 Jul 2005 11:56:07 -, John Levine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ICANN's leadership has long claimed and probably believed that the DOC
> would eventually cut them free. Of course other governments have never
> been thrilled that the root belongs to the US Gov't, but treatment of
> countr
>Is this operational or dross?
Both, but mainly it's a one page press release from the Dep't of Commerce:
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/USDNSprinciples_06302005.htm
ICANN exists because of a DOC contact which you can find at
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/
ICANN's le
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 03:28:23PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
> > Basically it sounds like the U.S. Gov't (NTIA)/U.S. Dept of Commerce
> > will take back control of the root name servers from ICANN at some
> > point.
>
> no. they never let go of it. a change to a nameserver for an
> african cct
I received the following from a fellow forum member who happens to be living in
Germany after I posted the same story, elsewhere:
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=21469219
ORSN (European Open Root Server Network)
http://www.orsn.net/
The Open Root Server Network (ORSN) is worki
> Basically it sounds like the U.S. Gov't (NTIA)/U.S. Dept of Commerce
> will take back control of the root name servers from ICANN at some
> point.
no. they never let go of it. a change to a nameserver for an
african cctld has to go through the us dept of commerce. they
are saving us from t
14 matches
Mail list logo
