You don't say whether you're using Cisco, but recent IOSes have no trouble
with huge configurations. You may have to use 'service compress-config'.
Just stay with some specific items on large configurations though. Don´t for
example dream of large access lists or your box will crash and burn.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Mike Bernico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, by accepting routes from CPE you create a huge security
vulnerability
for your customers, and other parties. This practice was understood
as a
very bad network engineering for decades.
Is there someplace I can find
Hi,
I apologize if this has been asked before. I work for an ISP that
started very small (hundreds of T1 and 56k customers) and has grown very
large in the last few years (thousands of T1 customers, as well as DS3
customers and OC3 customers).
We currently use an IGP to route between our
We switched to BGP just recently, before things got out of hand. I highly
recommend that you do so. It really does work better. It's very nice seeing
your OSPF config carry essentially just the loopback interfaces.
In particular I'm wondering about the thousands of lines of
configuration
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Mike Bernico wrote:
Hi,
I apologize if this has been asked before. I work for an ISP that
started very small (hundreds of T1 and 56k customers) and has grown very
large in the last few years (thousands of T1 customers, as well as DS3
customers and OC3 customers).
My recommendation would be for you to:
o redistribute directly connected interfaces via a strict
filter into BGP and use iBGP to carry it around the local
AS
or
o use passive interfaces in IGPs to do the same
Avoid having to run a topology computation everytime a
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Mike Bernico wrote:
We currently use an IGP to route between our distribution routers and
the CPE routers we manage.
So, if customers bounce your IGP churns away? And customers have access to
your IGP data
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:09 AM
To: Mike Bernico
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: routing between provider edge and CPE routers
We switched to BGP just recently, before things got out of hand. I
highly
So, by accepting routes from CPE you create a huge security
vulnerability
for your customers, and other parties. This practice was understood
as a
very bad network engineering for decades.
Is there someplace I can find tidbits of information like this? I
haven't been alive decades so I
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Mike Bernico wrote:
Is there someplace I can find tidbits of information like this? I
haven't been alive decades so I must have missed that memo. Other than
this list I don't know where to find anyone with lots of experience
working for a service provider.
Well, this
might yield some more hits.
-Original Message-
From: Vadim Antonov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: January 29, 2003 21:50
To: Mike Bernico
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: routing between provider edge and CPE routers
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Mike Bernico wrote:
Is there someplace I can
11 matches
Mail list logo
