Leo Bicknell wrote:
To Bill's original e-mail. Can we count on 2x every 18 months going
forward? No. But betting on 2x every 24 months, and accounting for the
delta between currently shipping and currently available hardware seems
completely reasonable when assessing the real problem.
Leo Bicknell wrote:
Now, once the FIB is computed, can we push it into line cards, is
there enough memory on them, can they do wire rate lookups, etc are
all good questions and all quickly drift into specialized hardware.
There are no easy answers at that step...
I think we're agreeing
On Aug 12, 2007, at 6:41 AM, John Levine wrote:
The problems with domain tasting more affect web users, with vast
number of typosquat parking pages flickering in and out of existence.
Domain tasting clearly affects assessments based upon domains. With
millions added and removed daily as
On August 13, 2007 at 10:11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Douglas Otis) wrote:
On Aug 12, 2007, at 6:41 AM, John Levine wrote:
The problems with domain tasting more affect web users, with vast
number of typosquat parking pages flickering in and out of existence.
Domain tasting
On Aug 13, 2007, at 12:28 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Chris L. Morrow wrote:
but today that provision is: If you buy a domain you have 5 days to
'return' it. The reason behind the return could be: oops, I
typo'd or
hurray, please refund me for the 1M domains I bought 4.99
On Aug 13, 2007, at 11:40 AM, Steve Atkins wrote:
A question to the registrars here: What fraction of legitimate
domain registrations are reversed because the customer
didn't know how to spell, and noticed that within the five
day dictionary time?
From what I've seen here, most customers
6 matches
Mail list logo
