[NANOG] OT: Planetary-Scale Views on a Large Instant-Messaging Network.

Interesting Microsoft Research piece on macro-scale user behaviors: --- Roland Dobbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // +66.83.266.6344 mobile History is a great

Re: [NANOG] [NANOG-announce] NANOG43 in Brooklyn Registration & Hotel -- Cheap rates going going ...

Martin Hannigan wrote: > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Todd Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> y'all, >> >> just to remind everyone: > > ..that we never heard back from you as to why there is no IPV6 content > in the program in Brooklyn? :-) Not sure how you get ipv6 on your cable plant

Re: [NANOG] [NANOG-announce] NANOG43 in Brooklyn Registration & Hotel -- Cheap rates going going ...

On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Todd Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > y'all, > > just to remind everyone: ..that we never heard back from you as to why there is no IPV6 content in the program in Brooklyn? :-) Best, Martin ___ NANOG mailing li

[NANOG] [NANOG-announce] NANOG43 in Brooklyn Registration & Hotel -- Cheap rates going going ...

y'all, just to remind everyone: the discounted rate of registration for NANOG43 in Brooklyn expires Tuesday, April 30. after April 30, rates go up from $450 to $525. so if you want to save $75, please register now. https://nanog.merit.edu/registration/ almost more importantly, cheap hotel rat

[NANOG] AS3300-BT Infonet sends full table to AS1239-Sprint

All, At ~19:00 UTC today, AS3300-BT/Infonet announced their full routing table to AS1239-Sprint, and Sprint accepted it and re-announced it to all of their peers and transit customers. Example: *> 3.0.0.0 144.228.191.169 100 0 1239 3300 21484 6661 3257 701 703 80 i A

Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ?

Am 26.04.2008 um 21:12 schrieb Jay Hennigan: > John Levine wrote: > >> I'm wondering how much content is used TiVo style, not in real time, >> but fairly soon thereafter. It might make sense to multicast feeds >> to >> local caches so when people actually want stuff, it doesn't come all >> the

Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ?

John Levine wrote: > I'm wondering how much content is used TiVo style, not in real time, > but fairly soon thereafter. It might make sense to multicast feeds to > local caches so when people actually want stuff, it doesn't come all > the way across the net. I think the good folks at Akamai may

Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ?

Am 26.04.2008 um 20:42 schrieb Antonio Querubin: > On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Marc Manthey wrote: > >> " IF we would use multicast" streaming ONLY, for appropriet >> content , would `nt this " decrease " the overall internet >> traffic ? > > On one hand, the amount of content that is 'live' o

Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ?

>On one hand, the amount of content that is 'live' or 'continuous' and >suitable for multicast streaming isn't s large percentage of overall >internet traffic to begin with. So the effect of moving most live >content to multicast on the Internet would have little overall >effect. I'm wondering ho

Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ?

On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Marc Manthey wrote: " IF we would use multicast" streaming ONLY, for appropriet content , would `nt this " decrease " the overall internet traffic ? On one hand, the amount of content that is 'live' or 'continuous' and suitable for multicast streaming isn't s larg

Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ?

>> hello >> >> i have a question : >> >> " IF we would use multicast" streaming ONLY, for appropriet >> content , would `nt this " decrease " the overall internet >> traffic ? >> >> Isn?t this an argument for ip6 / greenip6 ;) aswell ? > > Some people make more money shipping more bits. T

Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ?

On Sat, Apr 26, 2008, Marc Manthey wrote: > hello > > i have a question : > > " IF we would use multicast" streaming ONLY, for appropriet > content , would `nt this " decrease " the overall internet traffic ? > > Isn?t this an argument for ip6 / greenip6 ;) aswell ? Some people make m

[NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ?

hello i have a question : " IF we would use multicast" streaming ONLY, for appropriet content , would `nt this " decrease " the overall internet traffic ? Isn´t this an argument for ip6 / greenip6 ;) aswell ? just my 2 cents marc -- Les enfants teribbles - research and deployment