imo, no more than 3-4 transit providers and maybe a presence at 1 or 2 ixp's
with x amount of peer's would be small
im not saying customers won't/don't care about latency, its just not
difficult to route around the problematic nodes (unless SP A/B/C gets to it
first and band aid the issue until re
>From: Christian Koch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 2:39 PM
>To: Robert E. Seastrom
>Cc: Eric Van Tol; nanog@nanog.org
>Subject: Re: Replacement for Avaya CNA/RouteScience
>
>agreed. i see the most benefit from these boxes geared towards networks >with
>critical apps tha
agreed. i see the most benefit from these boxes geared towards networks with
critical apps that are latency intensive and more than a handful of transit
providers than i do for a smaller provider..
depending on how many upstreams you're juggling, its not that hard to create
some traffic engineerin
Leo Bicknell wrote:
In a message written on Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 04:55:37PM +0200, Jeroen Massar
wrote:
In general though, ASNs are following:
http://www.space.net/~gert/RIPE/ipv6-filters.html
I don't know how common the strict/non-strict case is though, but
looking at GRH (http://www.sixxs.n
Eric Van Tol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like to hire that engineer, please. Can you send me his resume?
> Here's the job description:
>
> - Required to works 24x7x365.
> - Must monitor all network egress points to examine latency,
> retransmissions, packet loss, link utilization, and l
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Wall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 11:25 AM
> To: Drew Weaver
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Replacement for Avaya CNA/RouteScience
>
> Going off this and previous posts, you'd well-served to follow the
> advice you sarcast
what does vyatta have to do with route intelligence/optimization?
vyatta is just a router..
-c
-Original Message-
From: Michienne Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 07/03/08 10:36 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Replacement for Avaya CNA/RouteScience
Have you considered an
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Drew Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Howdy for reasons it might be inappropriate to discuss on this list
> we've decided that we're going to replace our Avaya/RouteScience box and
> we're looking for recommendations on different solutions for 'BGP manage
In a message written on Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 04:55:37PM +0200, Jeroen Massar
wrote:
> In general though, ASNs are following:
> http://www.space.net/~gert/RIPE/ipv6-filters.html
>
> I don't know how common the strict/non-strict case is though, but
> looking at GRH (http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/
Frank P. Troy wrote:
Hi,
Can someone point me to the latest information on the minimum IPv6 prefix
providers will accept for Provider Independent IPv6 prefixes?
Ask the providers directly, it is their network thus they will have
their own policies.
In general though, ASNs are followin
Hi,
Can someone point me to the latest information on the minimum IPv6 prefix
providers will accept for Provider Independent IPv6 prefixes?
Thanks
Frank
Frank P. Troy
703-396-8700
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Not sure if RIPE knows this, but the following url will give you a
list of RIPE allocations, many /20s, /17s and /16s which are either
hijacked or allocated directly to illegal spam operations (who have
obviously faked the RIPE application as 'ISPs' to get huge
allocations)...
http://www.
Have you considered any of the options from Vyatta?
Aside from the "roll your own" community offerings they also have a
precompiled virtual appliance as well as a physical appliance you can
use.
-
Michienne Dixon
Network Administrator
liNKCity
312 Armour Rd.
North Kansas City, MO 64116
www.linkc
Howdy for reasons it might be inappropriate to discuss on this list
we've decided that we're going to replace our Avaya/RouteScience box and we're
looking for recommendations on different solutions for 'BGP management
appliances'.
We're aware of the Internap FCP product, but is
Greetings,
My name is Nick, and I have inherited admin duties for tacid.org. For an
un-known amount of time (A month or more?) mail.tacid.org has been an
open-relay, and sending out large amounts of spam. This should now be fixed. If
anyone is having issues with this domain still, please contac
Dear Colleagues,
The IANA and the RIRs are working on an ongoing basis to verify and
correct registration data of legacy address space to identify free
space in these blocks.
As a result of this work the RIPE NCC will begin allocating from 188/8
in future.
The minimum allocation size for 188/8
16 matches
Mail list logo
