Nice .. Wish I'd gotten the same response when I'd nog-paged looking for an
AIM"(R)" [|net|ptn.aol] engineer.
(..which i'm still looking for, cough).
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Andrew D Kirch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I got a reply from several network engineers at Comcast, and they'
I got a reply from several network engineers at Comcast, and they're now
working on a resolution. Thanks for the fast work guys!
Andrew
Would a Comcast routing engineer contact me off list regarding a routing
issue in Chicago?
Andrew
I can recommend Isocore http://www.isocore.com/ (the same folks that run the
MPLS conference). Talk to Rajiv Papneja [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards,
Frank
Frank P. Troy
703-396-8700
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
-Original M
At 10:24 AM -0700 7/10/08, David Conrad wrote:
>Already gotten a hint that something along these lines would be
>desirable for LAX. I can propose something to the PC -- which would
>be more useful for folks, a more general DNSSEC signing workshop or a
>focused presentation on IANA's stuff?
>
>Rega
At 11:08 AM -0400 7/10/08, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 22:55:05 -0400, "Christopher Morrow"
>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
> aside from just getting some cctlds signed, i will be interested
https://www.dns-oarc.net
-Original Message-
From: Michael Sinatra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 1:13 PM
To: Jay R. Ashworth
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning
On 07/10/08 11:03, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> A
I'm doing some work for a rural phone company and Denver is the nearest
metro area for them. The only transport in their area is Qwest and a
response from someone with knowledge of how to coax a mileage free ethernet
transport link out of them would be quite welcome.
Drop me a note here if you
On 07/10/08 11:03, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
Another test, that apparently was publicized on some dnsops list:
dig +short porttest.dns-oarc.net TXT
The "some dnsops list" is the OARC public dns-operations list, and this
posting explains the tool and briefly describes the results:
http://lists.
Another test, that apparently was publicized on some dnsops list:
dig +short porttest.dns-oarc.net TXT
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Asso
> -Original Message-
> From: David Conrad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 1:26 PM
> To: Martin Hannigan
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache
poisoning
>
>
> On Jul 9, 2008, at 8:27 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> >>
In a message written on Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 12:30:08PM -0700, David Conrad
wrote:
> for root signing. The fact that root zone data you receive from the
> root servers is not signed may suggest that there is a bit more that
> needs to be done and pretty much all of that is NOT something ICANN
I need to report something about an IP belonging to them:
pool-.ny325.east.verizon.net
I've looked at their website and the whois record...and sent email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are these the right addresses? If someone works for verizon.net please le
On Jul 10, 2008, at 2:59 AM, Joao Damas wrote:
PS: I would also want a copy of, or a secure method to access, the
public part of the keys you use to sign those ccTLDs so I can place
them in ISC's DLV registry
IANA's 'interim trust anchor repository' will be publicly accessible
(of course).
On Jul 9, 2008, at 8:27 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
If there is sufficient interest, we could do a bar bof to describe
some of
the tools IANA has...
I think Sandy Murphy or other Sparta folks have presented some of the
work they've done on this... Perhaps finding one/some of them and
having a
Already gotten a hint that something along these lines would be
desirable for LAX. I can propose something to the PC -- which would
be more useful for folks, a more general DNSSEC signing workshop or a
focused presentation on IANA's stuff?
Regards,
-drc
On Jul 9, 2008, at 7:55 PM, Christo
On 7/10/08, Darrell Hyde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ...what did big 'ol 174 say?
>
>
> Cogent Network Status/DNS Server Status Description:
> Welcome to Cogent Communications' Network Status Message. Today is
> 7/10/08 @ 12:30 ET. At this time, some customers in the Chicago region
> may be ex
> ...what did big 'ol 174 say?
Cogent Network Status/DNS Server Status Description:
Welcome to Cogent Communications’ Network Status Message. Today is
7/10/08 @ 12:30 ET. At this time, some customers in the Chicago region
may be experiencing loss of connectivity in the 427 S LaSalle Data
Center.
...what did big 'ol 174 say?
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Brandon Galbraith <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is anyone seeing Cogent issues in the Chicago area? We have several racks
> with them, and our connectivity just dropped off.
>
> -brandon
>
--
^christian$
Cogent is indeed having a problem in the Chicago area. No ETR. Master ticket
# 759401.
-brandon
Is anyone seeing Cogent issues in the Chicago area? We have several racks
with them, and our connectivity just dropped off.
-brandon
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 9:17 PM, mark seiden-via mac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it probably has something to do with the large proportion of fraudsters
> using linked in and every personals site in the world for 419 and
> other confidence schemes, don't you think?
>
> of course, this only forces
it probably has something to do with the large proportion of fraudsters
using linked in and every personals site in the world for 419 and
other confidence schemes, don't you think?
of course, this only forces the fraudsters to use proxies, aol and
satellite
providers which are more difficult t
Can anyone recommend a reliable independent testing company that tests
network hardware performance?
We are considering buying testing hardware (right now we are looking at
Spirent TestCenter) and I wanted to see if there were other options...
Brian Knoll
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 22:55:05 -0400, "Christopher Morrow" <[EMAIL
>> PROTECTED]> said:
>
aside from just getting some cctlds signed, i will be interested in the
tools, usability, work flow, ... i.e. what
Hi all,
Are any of you experiencing some unusual delay at Sprint or Verizon network?
From here, we are getting about 400ms, where should be around 150-180ms.
Thanks,
Nicolas.
2 ibb2agu1-dist.antel.net.uy (200.40.0.143) 0 msec
ibb2agu2-dist.antel.net.uy (200.40.0.153) 4 msec
ibb2agu1-
Eric Davis (eric) writes:
> Anyone using Infoblox DNSOne? They claimed to have fixed their BIND version
> but I still see issues with source ports staying the same.
Which version are you running of the OS ?
I would love to get input on that be it in Dublin or elsewhere, both
sides: the authoritative server and the recursive validator. We have
ideas and want to do this but I will not claim to be the owner of THE
TRUTH, so input is much desired.
Joao
PS: I would also want a copy of, or a secure
Guyz. Anyone from Linkedin here? please
contact me offlist. We have not been able to open www.linkedin.com
from Our Ip space for close to 2 months now!!.
Any Help will be highly apreciated
Regards
--
Felix Bako
*Team Leader - Networks*
Africa Online (K) LTD
Tel: + 254 (20) 2792246
Fax: + 254 (20
29 matches
Mail list logo
