On 25/07/2008, at 6:45 AM, Scott Berkman wrote:
Is it just me or is the test page below down now?
Or maybe some poisoned the NS record for dns-oarc.net and sent it to
nowhere to stop testing! (J/K since I can get to the rest of the page
fine).
Hmm, cute.
So uh, is this patch available for
On Jul 11, 2008, at 7:58 AM, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
Reading through the JavaScript that drives http://www.doxpara.com/,
it appears to be pretty easy to write a non-AJAX client to query
Dan's
service. I threw one together in perl, named noclicky, that
allows you
to use Dan's service
BGP Update Report
Interval: 23-Jun-08 -to- 24-Jul-08 (32 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS2.0
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS4538 209277 2.9% 41.8 -- ERX-CERNET-BKB China Education
and Research Network Center
2
So is this patch a true fix or just a temporary fix until further
work can be done on the problem?
I guess you need to read some of the related
papers/presentations/advisories/etc
related to a subject that has been under discussion for more 20+ years.
Answering your questions, as said
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:37:55PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:31:01 EDT, Jay R. Ashworth said:
But it seems to me that Paul, you are here espousing the opinion that
there's no business value in people being able to trust that the domain
name they heard on a TV ad
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 07:31:30PM +1200, Nathan Ward wrote:
So uh, is this patch available for download over HTTPS with a key that
was generated by the vendor and signed by well trusted root CAs on a
boxes with OpenSSL versions not released by Debian?
PATCH NOW PATCH NOW seems like a
Regarding Bubba, he won't likely move until there is a real problem,
this makes it on CNN, and even then, he may not understand what is going
on. That win2k server in the corner never got updated. But when he
realizes
his business is at risk due to the buggy software, our pal Bubba
Valdis,
On Jul 24, 2008, at 6:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:43:10 PDT, David Conrad said:
On Jul 24, 2008, at 4:24 PM, Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
The problem is, once the ICANNt root is self-signed, the hope of
ever
revoking that dysfunctional mess as authority is gone.
Yes. We put in some Vyatta routers to extend our corporate network into
another building as a temporary solution (the building had a very short
lease, so our boss didn't want to spend any money on Juniper which is
our usual net gear vendor). Consequently, we are still there.. go figure.
When
So, you say that(sarcasm). I just got off a 45 minute call where
the US
Federal government is interested in how to effectively communicate to the
infrastructure operators the importance and risks of not upgrading the
resolvers.
Just tell them to call the head of DoC and explain why
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 11:04:59AM -0500, Jorge Amodio wrote:
So, you say that(sarcasm). I just got off a 45 minute call where
the US
Federal government is interested in how to effectively communicate to the
infrastructure operators the importance and risks of not upgrading the
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:07:40 -0400
Jared Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 11:04:59AM -0500, Jorge Amodio wrote:
So, you say that(sarcasm). I just got off a 45 minute
call where the US
Federal government is interested in how to effectively
communicate
Last thing to say is, I haven't tried upgrading since Vyatta abandoned
the XORP platform and moved to the Quagga platform, but I'm guessing
(based on experience w/ Quagga) that they have a lot fewer of these
quirks that I've described.
Quagga is pretty decent, but it is not uncommon for
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Jared Mauch wrote:
They wanted someone to apporach those NANOG guys to see if they'll get
off their butts and upgrade. Personally, I share some of their frustration
in getting the reasonable people to upgrade their software, knowing that
the unreasonable folks
Would you rather deploy a $3000 cisco edge box which is a unexpandable,
100 mbit piece of crap, or throw two $2000 Dell boxes and have a 1 GigE
platform?
You don't need two $2000 Dell boxes to get a 1G platform, but this isn't
the list for that. You also don't need a ton of money to do open
On 7/24/08, Hank Nussbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
Interestingly enough, Google just added a feature to GMail to force
secure connections:
http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2008/07/force-gmail-to-use-secure-connection.html
Jeff
I wish
Paul Vixie wrote:
in http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/306278
we see this text:
The DNS attacks are starting!!!
Below is a snippet of a logwatch from last night. Be sure all DNS
servers are updated if at all possible. The spooks are out in
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 18:14 -0400, Pete Carah wrote:
I saw much more than this *from the same address* starting two days ago,
and from several other blocks belonging to the same university starting
last week, to my home router and another server. So far my better
connected servers haven't
18 matches
Mail list logo
