-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- Gadi Evron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At least unlike blackworm, this one's damage could be measured.
Actually, BlackWorm was measured -- I have the CAIDA poster in
my cube. :-)
- - ferg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6
On Sat, 9 Aug 2008, Martin Hannigan wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 12:56 PM, brett watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Aug 8, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. wrote:
Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
Turning nanog into a rehash of digg's technology section or the front
page of news.com red
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 12:56 PM, brett watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 8, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. wrote:
>
>> Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
>>
>>> Turning nanog into a rehash of digg's technology section or the front
>>> page of news.com reduces nanog's utility.
>>
>> As d
I feel like I'm on the public blogs with all kinds of idiots giving their
opinion and everything degenerating as each entry is posted. I am only a
lurker on NANOG, just seeking intelligent info for my job. I've been
receiving
these emails for a few years now, but this is ridiculous. Not
On Aug 8, 2008, at 3:53 PM, Deepak Jain wrote:
According to: http://www.netbsd.org/docs/network/ipv6/
The fine folks at NetBSD really need to update their IPv6 FAQ. That
stuff looks like the IPv6 marketing spiel from 1997 or so that has
long ago been proven ... 'optimistic'.
Rather than
According to: http://www.netbsd.org/docs/network/ipv6/
* Larger IP address space. IPv4 uses only 32 bits for IP address
space, which allows only 4 billion nodes to be identified on the
Internet. 4 billion may look like a large number; however, it is less
than the human population on the e
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Patrick Giagnocavo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gadi Evron wrote:
>
>> While I realize this mailing list is mostly about network operations and
>> less about ISP operations, we had a discussion in the past where we have
>> seen some in our community do use this infor
Dear Friends,
LACNIC has just approved IPv6 assignment policies for End Users. These
policies will be implemented from September 1st 2008.
In order to comply with these new policies, LACNIC will assign from
the IPv6 address block 2801:::/24 with a longest prefix length of /
48.
We ki
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net.
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 8, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. wrote:
Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
Turning nanog into a rehash of digg's technology section or the
front page of news.com reduces nanog's utility.
As does the days and days of rehash of one of Gadi's postings.
And all of this BS is even *
Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
Turning nanog into a rehash of digg's technology section or the front
page of news.com reduces nanog's utility.
As does the days and days of rehash of one of Gadi's postings.
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
And, note carefully: some "dual-speed hubs" are actually a 10BT hub and
a 100BT hub *with a switch between them*. I forget which brand I
caught this on, but it bit me a couple of years back.
3COM Dual-Speed 10/100 hubs were this way. Got bit by that too back in
the day
Gadi Evron wrote:
While I realize this mailing list is mostly about network operations and
less about ISP operations, we had a discussion in the past where we have
seen some in our community do use this information effectively and find
it useful.
Thing is, I had already heard about the faceb
Gadi Evron wrote:
My thinking was that on the rare occasion when we can anticipate
*possible* and *serious* floods and bottle-necks at ISP tech-support
lines, across multiple providers and regions, we should share that
information. NANOG remains the best place for such information sharing.
I
Hello,
Could someone from earthlink.net mail ops please contact me off-list?
Thank you,
-David Prude
--
David Prude
System Administrator
Murphy & Durieu
(212)618-0320
BGP Update Report
Interval: 07-Jul-08 -to- 07-Aug-08 (32 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS2.0
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS9583 101208 1.6% 81.0 -- SIFY-AS-IN Sify Limited
2 - AS453894439 1.5%
This report has been generated at Fri Aug 8 21:16:30 2008 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
All,
On the subject of turning off mac learning on a switch, I've just
discovered this - an unusual way of using RSPAN to force the MAC
learning off on Cisco switches:
http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/05/turning-switch-into-hub/
# Turn MAC learning on ports Fa0/1 - 3
vtp mode tran
18 matches
Mail list logo
