Zed,
If you are looking for optical systems my fav pub is Lightwave at
http://lw.pennnet.com/. They list DWDM and CWDM systems, lasers, optics, ROADM
etc. If you have nanog archives go back at least six months to the thread on
DWDM vs CWDM et al that I was one of the contributors to.
The last
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Nitzan Tzelniker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Look here
>
> http://www.btisystems.com/news/releases/Goldfield_Telecom.php
These are XFP-based. Thus, not a solution to the problem above.
Answer: Nobody's making 10GE CWDM-wavelength lasers. Why? I don't have
enough knowledge of optical
Hi,
Look here
http://www.btisystems.com/news/releases/Goldfield_Telecom.php
Nitzan
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 21:54, Zed Usser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I seem to suffer from an acute lack of 10GE CWDM optics options. Is it just
> me or am I just looking in all the wrong places?
>
> Yo
Received this update for GNi:
At this time we believe we have found a Cisco day 0 network
vulnerability.
We have 20+ routers in our core network - 6 of the 20 have the
identical route
processor and IOS version. These 6 have been affected in 3 separate
geographical locations in the past se
everyone seems to have their saying from leting you wonder on what is the
problem to making assumptions to witty technical explanations and useless
question rephrased. For some reading this some are just non-technical
individuals posting messages. All can be done ..we all know the BGP selec
We found a routing loop on 8/20 caused by some maintenance that either
did not get completed, wasn't properly configured, or otherwise had
some problems the evening before. At that point I went ahead and shut
down BGP peering and asked to be notified when all was well.
8/26 notified that al
Hi!
I seem to suffer from an acute lack of 10GE CWDM optics options. Is it just me
or am I just looking in all the wrong places?
You'd think that by now there would be an upgrade market from 1GE to 10GE. DWDM
wavelenghts are not always available, but CWDM often are.
- Zed
Anyone using transit from GNi at 365main seeing problems on routes
that normally go over Above.net?
For the last 36 hours, we've had problems. GNi isn't saying anything
except that "replacement router cards are being delivered".
I'm not sure if it's just routing via Above.net but lots of ro
Hello,
We have updated the AS8404
whith IP Rages 94.100.157/24 and 94.100.158.0/23.
The Update of the Ripe Database was maked 1 week ago. Our clients has also have
Problems to connect some Servers in USA. Over AT&T and HP (i see is an ATT
link too)
Is possible that AT&T has some Routers which
The biggest issue with using a heavy hammer to effect traffic is that
you don't always know why the other side is routing the way they are.
Could be simple cost (peer vs transit) or a larger issue like
congestion. Either way think before you route.
I'm thinking Pandora's box hasn't just been open
True but I can still believe in a warm and fuzzy internet if I try
really hard Then my cell phone rings and back to the real world.
-jim
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 12:01 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 29, 2008, at 22:41, "jim deleskie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
> On 30/08/2008, at 9:58 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> > * Alex Pilosov:
> >
> >> We've demonstrated ability to monitor traffic to arbitrary
> >> prefixes. Slides for presentation can be found here:
> >> http://eng.5ninesdata.com/~tkapela/iphd-2.ppt
> >
> > The interesting question is whether it's
* jim deleskie:
> Announcing a smaller bit of one of you block is fine, more then that
> most everyone I know does it or has done and is commonly accepted.
> Breaking up someone else' s block and making that announcement even if
> its to modify traffic between 2 peered networks is typically not
>
Raymond:
Thanks a lot for your comments, but... nobody can be sure that their complete
prefix is routed OK to him (the "owner" AS).
Right?
Do you see this as a normal behavior?
What do you think that is the best way to protect about this?
Do you think that our upstreams can help us?
Best regar
Hi!
Some days ago, a BGP issue was announced about "IP hijacking".
OK, we understand that this is some "new" because the traffic is also sent
back to the "real owner" of the block.
Traffic will walk the shotest path, so you can never tell its the 'real'
owner that will receive this traffic.
Sorry for sending this "huge" mail :-)
At this moment we have a very simple multihomed ASN with a /20 prefix
(x.y.0.0/20) like many other companys in the world.
Some days ago, a BGP issue was announced about "IP hijacking".
OK, we understand that this is some "new" because the traffic is also sen
16 matches
Mail list logo
