Quoting D'Arcy J.M. Cain ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Personally I think that the answer to this problem is to simply reply
automatically to these challenges positively no matter what. Puts the
job of filtering spam back on the first person.
I tend to click on the 'authorize' links i see in any
snip
I too think C-R spam 'prevention' is the lazy-mans approach at filtering
spam. People can easily create their own whitelists based on their
maillogs or mailhistory.
snip
Unfortunately, I feel the majority of the solutions offered cater to the
non-technical. The process of simplifying often
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 08:37:51 -0500
Michienne Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I too think C-R spam 'prevention' is the lazy-mans approach at filtering
spam. People can easily create their own whitelists based on their
maillogs or mailhistory.
snip
Unfortunately, I feel the majority of
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 09:44:57 EDT, D'Arcy J.M. Cain said:
I don't have any argument with making the end-user's experience simpler
and easier. I do complain when that simplification is at the expense
of others. It's the difference between software that does some of your
work and software that
On Oct 9, 2008, at 6:37 AM, Michienne Dixon wrote:
snip
I too think C-R spam 'prevention' is the lazy-mans approach at
filtering
spam. People can easily create their own whitelists based on their
maillogs or mailhistory.
snip
Unfortunately, I feel the majority of the solutions offered cater
Charles Wyble wrote:
I second that. Worked at several places that used them. Also check out
Graybar. They have a will call office in Van Nuys. http://www.graybar.com/
PDU search results for example: http://tinyurl.com/4xh4wg
If you're looking for a one stop place, Graybar is great.
But if
http://www.racksolutions.com/
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Rogelio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles Wyble wrote:
I second that. Worked at several places that used them. Also check out
Graybar. They have a will call office in Van Nuys.
http://www.graybar.com/
PDU search results for
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't want the securest implementation. You want one that's
secure enough while still allowing the job to get done. You also don't
want to be *paying* for more security than you actually need. Note that
the higher price paid to the vendor isn't
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/DNS/DNSSEC.html
vote early, vote often.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED],darkuncle.net} || 0x5537F527
http://darkuncle.net/pubkey.asc for public key
9 matches
Mail list logo
