These guys claim upto 180km:
http://www.bookham.com/datasheets/transceivers/IGP-28111.cfm
Tim:>
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Fletcher Kittredge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Thanks to all that replied. A bit more background: By regulation, the
> local ILEC is required to supply us with da
Thanks to all that replied. A bit more background: By regulation, the
local ILEC is required to supply us with dark fiber where available. They
have taken the regulatory stance that it is not technically possible to use
dark fiber runs of more than 60 miles (prior, their regulatory stance was
MRV or Finisar are good places to look for your optics. 120km is no
problem for 1G/2.7G. Depending on the qualities of your fiber 150km may
be within the 120km budget.
Deepak
Holmes,David A wrote:
MRV Lambda Driver CWDM claims 200km with Raman amplification cards.
Atrica, now owned by Nokia
MRV Lambda Driver CWDM claims 200km with Raman amplification cards.
Atrica, now owned by Nokia, Ethernet switches claim 120 km
-Original Message-
From: Fletcher Kittredge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008 11:50 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: transcievers/amplifiers
Try,
NOC ITMC/NOC +902125209898 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mehmet
From: Paul Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:55:41 -0700
To: Beavis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: DDoS Attack in Progress.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Not surprisin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Not surprising -- TurkTelekom has long been known to be a hotbed of
malicious activity, a known hoster for Russian/Ukrainian cyber criminals,
and perhaps one of the most botnetted ISPs on the planet:
http://itw.trendmicro-europe.com/index.php?id=64
We are looking to light a two strand fiber link of about 95 miles (or
150km). It would be worth a lot to us not to have repeaters. We are
hoping for Gigabit Ethernet. Sonet is possible but a less attractive
solution. Are there options for this sort of distance? The longest
current link we
Hi All,
DoS attack in progress, any upstream info for these guys? their
phone number doesn't respond.
This is the RIPE Whois query server #1.
% The objects are in RPSL format.
%
% Rights restricted by copyright.
% See http://www.ripe.net/db/copyright.html
% Note: This output has been filtered
It depends on how many active flows you have at any one time. Also, I
don't think the SIP-601 supports full netflow V5 in hardware, only V8,
which is aggregated netflow, which may not be what you want. It does
do V5/V9 sampled netflow in hardware. The sampled netflow on that
platform is b
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net.
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've seen these a few times, usually traced back to LAG issues on
their Force10s (ebr in traceroute).
Drive Slow,
Paul Wall
On 10/10/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It sounds like an issue that we've seen twice with them. They'll be
> routing an entire block for us just fine,
Hi all, the LC on 12000 series is 12000-SIP-601 (engine 5) with multiple STM-1
SPA card. As far as I know the engine 5 card cannot do 450Kpps on netflow.
Since the STM-1 is mainly for NB-AMR traffic (95%), do you recommend the
sampled netflow instead? Does anyone aware of the sampled netflow acc
Open source netlow collector NTOP: http://www.ntop.org
-Original Message-
From: Mills, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008 12:46 PM
To: Lee, Steven (NSG Malaysia); nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Help needed - Cisco Netflow
Lee,
The question would be do
It sounds like an issue that we've seen twice with them. They'll be
routing an entire block for us just fine, but traffic for one IP will get
stuck in a routing loop and never makes it to us. The one time that it
happened the technician ended up doing a few soft clears on their BGP, and
the o
Lee,
The question would be do you want a self contained appliance or a
piece of software? I have used Advent Network's Net Flow Analyzer.
There are others out there but I've had some decent amount of luck with
these guys and they have an "Enterprise" license that will many, many
(thousands?) i
Hi all, I have a customer who has a MPLS network for E/// Media Gateway (MGW)
NB-AMR VoIP traffic. The packet size for the NB-AMR traffic is fixed size 110
bytes. During the high load period, it can reaches 450Kpps on a STM-1 link. The
router platform is Cisco 12000 series, can the router genera
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 11:48:14 -0700
"Scott Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/DNS/DNSSEC.html
>
> vote early, vote often.
And note that you have to use the procedure in the Federal Register
notice for you comment to count.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.c
A city, IP address or something along those lines would be helpful ;)
We have a level(3) connection and haven't seen anything yet today
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Josh Marchant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October 10, 2008 10:32 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: LVL3 Issues?
Any
Any one else noticing routing Issues with LVL3? I have customers that
cannot get to some of my IP's that are in the same block coming though LVL3.
This report has been generated at Fri Oct 10 21:18:20 2008 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
BGP Update Report
Interval: 08-Sep-08 -to- 09-Oct-08 (32 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS2.0
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS9583 238199 3.0% 195.7 -- SIFY-AS-IN Sify Limited
2 - AS1803 117148 1.5%
21 matches
Mail list logo
