Cogent transition or prep work this morning? AS 2914 NTT?
Anyone else seeing similar changes abroad?
CORE INFRASTRUCTURE AFFECTING ALERT *
--
BGP Status Change Sequence No: 1225957222
:- Lamar == Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Charles Wyble [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lamar Owen wrote:
There are three ways that I know of (feel free to add to this list) to
limit the events:
1.) As you mentioned, regulation (or a government run and regulated
backbone);
Cogent transition or prep work this morning? AS 2914 NTT?
Anyone else seeing similar changes abroad?
CORE INFRASTRUCTURE AFFECTING ALERT *
--
BGP Status Change Sequence No: 1225957222
On 06/11/2008 02:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who owns the DNS root?
The US Government claims to. However, asserting authority over the DNS
root is a different matter to a mere claim to ownership, and if the US
Government were to unilaterally decide on an action which directly acted
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4 nov 2008, at 10.14, Lincoln Dale wrote:
There is an emerging need to distribute highly accurate time
information over IP and over MPLS packet switched networks (PSNs).
good of you to ask. it exists today.
http://ieee1588.nist.gov/
Just a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4 nov 2008, at 07.23, Paul Ferguson wrote:
I'm just wondering -- in globak scheme of security issue, is NTP
security a major issue?
Just curious.
Maybe not NTP per se but timing is.
Best regards,
- - kurtis -
-BEGIN PGP
Thanks.
These links have been of some assistance, however some of the questions
seem irrelevant to the specified situation once the a first handful are
answered. Perhaps they are intended to be a test of a person's
comprehensive ability (or not).
Someone off-list mentioned the possible google
Yes bgp multihop is a GREAT* way to figure out if a cablemodem** is even
/really/ online.
Alas, I've not see much on the traffic engineering side either.
* Read the only way i've found to do this with cisco's ios
** or any other pipe for that matter.
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Charles Wyble
Hi,
On LKML (Linux Kernel Mailing List) there is talk
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/4/151 about shipping the Linux kernel with
ECN turned on by default (it was on by default a few years back but that
change was reverted due to too many sites dropping ECN enabled SYNs).
Recent investigations
9 matches
Mail list logo
