RE: MPLS for IPv6

Hi Julien, > > If we consider the phases in terms of IPv6 deployment, > > > > Ph-0: IPv4 only > > Ph-1: IPv4/v6 dual stack + v4/v6 coexistence technologies > > Ph-2: IPv6 only > > Hmm, not quite. I'd say: > > v4 only > v4/v6 dual stack, with v4 being primary (for network > management, r

Re: MPLS for IPv6

On 10/11/08 17:36, Miya Kohno wrote: > > > If we consider the phases in terms of IPv6 deployment, > > Ph-0: IPv4 only > Ph-1: IPv4/v6 dual stack + v4/v6 coexistence technologies > Ph-2: IPv6 only Hmm, not quite. I'd say: v4 only v4/v6 dual stack, with v4 being primary (for network mana

RE: MPLS for IPv6

If we consider the phases in terms of IPv6 deployment, Ph-0: IPv4 only Ph-1: IPv4/v6 dual stack + v4/v6 coexistence technologies Ph-2: IPv6 only I suppose MPLS v6 control plane would become necessary at Ph-2, or a later stage of Ph-1. In the meantime, MPLS can be viewed as one of the v

Comcast Abuse Contact

Hello, I have a case open with the abuse department that is stalled. Could someone, who can help me escalate this case, contact me off list? Thank you! Adam Stasiniewicz Direct: 575-233-7672

Re: MPLS for IPv6

On Friday 07 November 2008 17:22:33 David Freedman wrote: > So please, if you are spending your hard earned cash, > please ask for an LDP6 implementation, "no demand" should > not be the case. I sent our SE's at C & J yet another reminder about this. Mark. signature.asc Description: This is a

Re: Dmain names for the interfaces of a router

On 11/9/08, Kai Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi everyone, my question is that, in practice, if there are different > interfaces (different IP addresses) on the same border router having > different domain names? thanks. > > I've found this quite helpful: http://www-td.rutgers.edu/documentat

Dmain names for the interfaces of a router

Hi everyone, my question is that, in practice, if there are different interfaces (different IP addresses) on the same border router having different domain names? thanks.