On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Lorell Hathcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All:
My customer wants to try to improve performance to his ATAs by creating a
VPN from his network to the VOIP provider's network through the internet.
I have to admit, the idea caught me flat footed. At the
I think that the 7750SR routers are great and you won't be let down.
We used to have an all Cisco network and I was skeptical at first but
they have been great.
As for nss and nsr when we tested this by failing a cpm we saw less
than 50 ms of traffic loss. I would see if you could go to
Hello fellow nanogers,
I am a long time user of Cisco gear and currently evaluating an alternative
for my network expansion. currently the one that looks like it will be able
to do the job iare Alcatel-Lucent 7710/7750 service routers.
I am looking for real life experience of those who have used
I guess they have good lab in Plano, TX also!!!I worked on the same routers
for IPTV deployment and really they are best!!!
regards
Devang Patel
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Dan Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that the 7750SR routers are great and you won't be let down. We
used
On Wed, November 12, 2008 12:40, Raymond Macharia wrote:
Hello fellow nanogers,
I am a long time user of Cisco gear and currently evaluating an
alternative
for my network expansion. currently the one that looks like it will be
able
to do the job iare Alcatel-Lucent 7710/7750 service
After reading this, and the (Washington Post I believe--I'm away from
my laptop right now) article on this, two things are bothering me.
The article expressed a good deal of frustration with the (lack of)
speed with which law enforcement has been tackling these issues. What
wasn't clear
The more we allow Gadi Evron to post the more this list turns into a
rehash of digg and reddit news aggregation web sites.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:37 AM, Gadi Evron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:22:42 -0800
From: Paul Ferguson
Lorell,
It has been my experience that the VPN traffic will not be prioritize
through the Internet. Why don't you suggest a test site for a comparison.
Frank
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Lorell Hathcock [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
All:
My customer wants to try to improve performance to
The local scope of the event is also the reason that PHAS did not catch the
hijack. Nevertheless, its good to have different services for hijack
detection running independently, especially if they are getting different
feeds. Even a hijack that is local in scope is worth alerting about; if not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Kee Hinckley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After reading this, and the (Washington Post I believe--I'm away from my
laptop right now) article on this, two things are bothering me.
The article expressed a good deal of
Right now wee are also looking into the same question with the help of
Overlay Routing. As far as Multihoming is concerned, there is a good work by
jenifer rexford
http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~jrex/papers/multipath06.pdfhttp://www.cs.princeton.edu/%7Ejrex/papers/multipath06.pdf.
In fact IETF guys
Dear Fellows,
I would like to add some information to this thread from AS27664 perspective.
Both AS27664 (CTBC MultimÃdia) and AS22548 (Nic.br) share two common points:
1. They are IP transit customers from AS16735 (CTBC Telecom).
2. They feed with full BGP routing table the RIS/RIPE project
On Nov 11, 2008, at 7:52 PM, mike wrote:
Since 11/5, my spam load has dropped from about 400,000 attempts
per day to less than 40,000 ! And most of this I had noted was
comming from what looked like compromised web hosts - eg: same host/
domain name representing 10 or 20 addresses in any
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 14:16, Nick Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many cops does it take to throw a community lynching?
None.
The question that remains is: Why is the community having to resort to lynching?
Following the metaphor and using the US Old West as an example,
lynchings were
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Kee Hinckley wrote:
After reading this, and the (Washington Post I believe--I'm away from my
laptop right now) article on this, two things are bothering me.
The article expressed a good deal of frustration with the (lack of) speed
with which law enforcement has been
Jason Ross wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 14:16, Nick Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many cops does it take to throw a community lynching?
None.
The question that remains is: Why is the community having to resort to lynching?
Following the metaphor and using the US Old West as an
On 13/11/2008, at 12:39 AM, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
Because the broadband connection was so fast, TCP was able to
repair the impairments without reducing voice quality.
That works fine if latency+window size is low, so that segments are
retransmitted quickly.
You really should also do the
n3td3v wrote:
The more we allow Gadi Evron to post the more this list turns into a
rehash of digg and reddit news aggregation web sites.
Well, I'll just drop off the list so you you can talk uninterrupted
about Important Operational Matters like who's got a freebie DSL
connection for me in
I wonder how many of these pseudo-anarchists are bewailing the lack of
regulation in the financial markets, given the events of the past couple of
months? A certain amount of regulation and oversight is needed, both in the
financial world and on the Internet. I am all for seeing how little we
Yes, all our traffic was dying over at UUNet, yet it was still being
announced it. It just came up before I could send anything to outages.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Beckman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 13:48
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject:
There's a common misconception of what LE does online (and when I say LE, I'm
talking mostly state/local agencies): if you watch CSI or any other show that
has anything to do with computer crimes, there is always a team of uber-geeks
at every single agency (no matter how big it is) who spend
Same here... I'm a Verizon FiOS customer... My Vonage line went dead in the
middle of a call...
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Darryl Dunkin wrote:
ddunkiYes, all our traffic was dying over at UUNet, yet it was still being
ddunkiannounced it. It just came up before I could send anything to outages.
Confirmed here as well; Saw loss on DS3s between 424 and 440 EST. BGP
survived but routing didnt ..
No RCA yet from VZN (on hold).
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Peter Beckman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At about 4:24pm EDT, I lost connectivity from Verizon to destinations in
New York,
At about 4:24pm EDT, I lost connectivity from Verizon to destinations in
New York, Seattle and others. Came back up (4:46pm) while composing this
email. Anyone else notice? Major problem or minor routing issue?
Packets Pings
Host
Peter Beckman wrote:
At about 4:24pm EDT, I lost connectivity from Verizon to destinations
in
New York, Seattle and others. Came back up (4:46pm) while composing
this
email. Anyone else notice? Major problem or minor routing issue?
Beckman
I'm still on hold with Verizon -- has anyone
Same here. Saw the issue from Los Angeles, and from New York. Traces were
dropping a few hops into the Verizon cloud. BGP stayed up, but routing went
nowhere.
Paul
From: jamie rishaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 11/12/2008 3:14 PM
To: Peter Beckman
I do know that the CA AG office ignores any complaints received from the
Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3), which bars many complaints state/local
LE would have received from the public about McColo. Law enforcement (in the
US, anyway), by nature, is 99% reactive and 1% proactive; no
Yes, we saw the same thing and all seems to be better now. Was on hold
and hung up.
Mike Walter, MCP
Systems Administrator
3z.net a PCD Company
http://www.3z.net
When Success is the Only Solution think 3z.net
-Original Message-
From: Peter Beckman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
28 matches
Mail list logo
