Hello.
I've run into a bit of a snag and I hope some folks here may be able to
enlighten. From time to time I check the 'sh platform hardware
capacity' command on our Catalyst 6509s and have noticed this item:
CPU Resources
CPU utilization: Module 5 seconds 1 minute
On Sat, 15 Nov 2008, Philip L. wrote:
I've run into a bit of a snag and I hope some folks here may be able to
enlighten. From time to time I check the 'sh platform hardware capacity'
command on our Catalyst 6509s and have noticed this item:
CPU Resources
CPU utilization: Module
* Jon Lewis:
I've run into a bit of a snag and I hope some folks here may be able
to enlighten. From time to time I check the 'sh platform hardware
capacity' command on our Catalyst 6509s and have noticed this item:
MSFC/PFC version is also relevant.
5000 lines for ACL? I don't have any
This is on a Sup720-3BXL by the way:
'sh mls netflow table-con detailed:'
Earl in Module 5
Detailed Netflow CAM (TCAM and ICAM) Utilization
TCAM Utilization : 100%
ICAM Utilization : 6%
Netflow TCAM count : 262024
Netflow ICAM count : 8
Netflow
On Nov 4, 2008, at 3:11 AM, Glen Kent wrote:
My original question got drowned amidst all this vibrant discussions!
Do folks already use or plan to use Autokey for NTP?
In my experience most people have a hard enough time remembering to
run ntp at all (and with an even remotely sane
On Sat, 15 Nov 2008, Philip L. wrote:
This is on a Sup720-3BXL by the way:
'sh mls netflow table-con detailed:'
Earl in Module 5
Detailed Netflow CAM (TCAM and ICAM) Utilization
TCAM Utilization : 100%
ICAM Utilization : 6%
Netflow TCAM count :
Jon Lewis wrote:
On Sat, 15 Nov 2008, Philip L. wrote:
This is on a Sup720-3BXL by the way:
'sh mls netflow table-con detailed:'
Earl in Module 5
Detailed Netflow CAM (TCAM and ICAM) Utilization
TCAM Utilization : 100%
ICAM Utilization : 6%
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If they are, then I sure wish that someone would explain reconnecting
McColo:
http://www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=as26780
With all of the evidence of criminal activity there, I would like to assume
that this is just a case of ignorance.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Paul Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If they are, then I sure wish that someone would explain reconnecting
McColo:
http://www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=as26780
With all of the evidence of criminal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Matthew Moyle-Croft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is the spam SMTP meant to be originating from the McColo ranges or is it
being used to control other machines elsewhere?
The latter.
Also a host of other badness, not
On 16/11/2008, at 5:30 PM, Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
Is the spam SMTP meant to be originating from the McColo ranges or
is it being used to control other machines elsewhere?
The latter.
--
Nathan Ward
Overall spam levels don't seem to have re-attained their previous
lofty heights yet:
http://www.spamcop.net/spamgraph.shtml?spamweek
http://www.spamcop.net/spamgraph.shtml?spamstats
-jasper
On 16/11/2008, at 5:37 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On
Thanks for that Paul,
It's a pity - the slightly hazy Sunday afternoon brain was hoping, for
once, for an easy fix!
MMC
Paul Ferguson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Matthew Moyle-Croft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is the spam SMTP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Jasper Bryant-Greene
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Overall spam levels don't seem to have re-attained their previous lofty
heights yet:
http://www.spamcop.net/spamgraph.shtml?spamweek
Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
Is the spam SMTP meant to be originating from the McColo ranges or is it
being used to control other machines elsewhere?
On the spam front, it's mostly command and control connections inbound
from infected machines to McColo-based controllers. Hence, unless you
can
If we all dropped routes from 26780 at the edge, I wonder how long it
would be before their prefixes popped up somewhere else.
Justin
Paul Ferguson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Paul Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If they are,
At 07:22 PM 15-11-08 -0800, Paul Ferguson wrote:
If they are, then I sure wish that someone would explain reconnecting
McColo:
http://www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=as26780
With all of the evidence of criminal activity there, I would like to assume
that this is just a case of
17 matches
Mail list logo
