Anyone else seeing this:
* 91.196.186.0/24 62.237.167.25 0 3292 3549 15703
43531 23456 i
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4893.txt
6. Transition
An OLD BGP speaker MUST NOT use AS_TRANS as its Autonomous System
number.
Seeing it here too. On our 4-byte capable
On (2009-02-28 18:05 +0100), sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
show route 195.128.231.0/24 detail
[..omitted..]
AS path: AS2 PA[5]: 39792 35320 AS_TRANS AS_TRANS 35748
AS path: AS4 PA[4]: 35320 3.21 AS_TRANS 35748
AS path: Merged[5]: 39792 35320
nan...@yorku.ca wrote:
I'm rsrching the Peering Wars of 1998...anyone able to provide info wd be
greatly appreciated.
MAE-East was knee-deep in blood. I still have nightmares.
--
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
http://www.returnpath.net/
Whic one of these, is locally assigned unicast MAC address, when talking about
output format CSCO uses?
4000.. (Local IXPs choice)
0200.. (My money is here)
the second one. most significant byte is on the left, but within the
byte, most significant bits are on the right. so
Hi everyone,
Hopefully my question is operational 'enough' to be asked here, as I
don't know of any other place to ask...
Still trying to redesign (as-I-go) our ISP network, I've realized that
we are not large enough to deploy a full three layer approach (core,
dist, acc), so I'm trying to
http://standards.ieee.org/regauth/oui/oui.txt
02-07-01 (hex) RACAL-DATACOM
A0-6A-00 (hex) Verilink Corporation
In either case two of the lowest or highest bits of 1st octet seems to be
happily used to assign addresses. What am I missing here?
After enabling
Francois Menard wrote:
The Coalition of Internet Service Providers has filed a substantial
contribution at the CRTC stating:
1) The CRTC should forbid DPI, as it cannot be proven to be 98.5%
effective at trapping P2P, such as to guarantee congestion relief
2) The CRTC should allow for
On (2009-02-28 22:38 +0100), JAKO Andras wrote:
Hey,
http://standards.ieee.org/regauth/oui/oui.txt
02-07-01 (hex)RACAL-DATACOM
After enabling DECnet routing, the interface MAC address turns to
something like this:
Hardware is BCM1250 Internal MAC, address is
Hi all
main router- 3 static routes
ip route 192.168.0.0/24 10.0.0.1 (routerA)
ip route 192.168.1.0/24 10.0.0.2 (routerB) same switch ---telecom
company---client request
ip route 192.168.2.0/24 10.0.0.3 (routerC)
Diagram
===
---routerA---
Can someone with a clue from the following two carriers please contact me
off list?
XO - ASN 2828
Level 3 - ASN 3356
I am currently experiencing a UDP/DNS DOS originating from 165.194.27.159 in
Aisia. We have attempted to blackhole the subnet using BGP communities, but
the requests are being
10 matches
Mail list logo
