hi,
I want to ask some folks out there that maintain reverse DNS queries
of their respective IP blocks. I want to know if there is a need for
me to contact my upstream provider. I am in charge of 2 /24's under
LACNIC. I've already registered my DNS servers on LACNIC. but for some
weird reason
Anyone else seeing an outage with Savvis in the Chicago area? Specifically
in their colo we are seeing asynchronous connectivity, traffic is coming in,
but not getting back out.
Jeff Rooney
jtroo...@nexdlevel.com
Slighty related...
Can people please post their recommended reverse dns naming conventions for a
small ISP with growth and scalability in mind.
I already have one drawn up, but I would like to contrast and compare :D
Thanks
On 21 Mar 2009 10:32:30 -, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
I
I want to ask some folks out there that maintain reverse DNS queries
of their respective IP blocks. I want to know if there is a need for
me to contact my upstream provider. I am in charge of 2 /24's under
LACNIC. I've already registered my DNS servers on LACNIC. but for some
weird reason it's
i am getting one volume of the list thats vol 14.i sure bet i am missing
some vol's. can you give me a hand on this anyone
--
regards
DAVID
nanog-requ...@nanog.org wrote:
hi,
I want to ask some folks out there that maintain reverse DNS queries
of their respective IP blocks. I want to know if there is a need for
me to contact my upstream provider. I am in charge of 2 /24's under
LACNIC. I've already registered my DNS servers on
the 20th or 21st century answer?
if you really don't care about the actual node, then you should map the
numbers to topologically significant names - after all, the reverse map
follows topology, not some goofball - layer 9 - ego trip thing.
or - the more modern approach is to let the node
* Hank Nussbacher:
Older LIRs have more allocations which compensates for the time
factor of the algorithm. Older allocations need almost no human
handling by the RIR vs a new LIR of a year which has a oodles of
tickets that need human intervention.
And how much of that is the result of not
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 8:00 AM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
the 20th or 21st century answer?
if you really don't care about the actual node, then you should map
the
numbers to topologically significant names - after all, the reverse
map
follows topology, not some
It takes me about 3-5 hours of work to track down and get an old
unused ASN to be deallocated. How about updating the 2010 charging
model so that LIRs that return ASNs are compensated?
I don't think this is a good way of using RIR funds. Why should the
old guys receive even more special
* Randy Bush:
the real path is to move forward, increase income, and grow.
Sure. I was enlightened when someone posted to a RIPE mailing list,
we are heading towards a future where address space is scarce (my
words, not his). But the exact opposite is true.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 08:44:23AM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
perhaps there is a lesson here. move on to 4-byte asns.
randy
er... 'parm me sir, but aren't -all- ASNs 4 bytes?
i mean, for lo these many years we cheated and only
used the first two bytes... but the
The recommendations in this draft proposal have worked for me:
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-msullivan-dnsop-generic-naming-schemes-00.txt
Frank
-Original Message-
From: br...@yoafrica.com [mailto:br...@yoafrica.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 5:39 AM
To: John Levine
Cc:
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Heather Schiller wrote:
I don't think old vs new really matters.. pardon me for sticking w/ ARIN in
this example.. I can follow their fee structure easiest - and doesn't have
the old vs new: (https://www.arin.net/fees/fee_schedule.html)
ARIN charges $100/yr for ASN's
On Saturday 21 March 2009 06:38:55 pm br...@yoafrica.com
wrote:
Slighty related...
Can people please post their recommended reverse dns
naming conventions for a small ISP with growth and
scalability in mind. I already have one drawn up, but I
would like to contrast and compare :D
As
15 matches
Mail list logo
