On Jun 4, 2009, at 9:38 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2009/06/ftc_sues_shuts_down_n_calif_we.html
while allegedly a black hat, this is the first case i know of in which
the usg has shut down an isp. nose of camel? first they came for ...
It's good to see
We uploaded another interview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrE1TEan4Jo
To make sure we cover as many areas of the industry as possible, we
asked Patrik Fältström on the role of government in IPv6 deployment.
Patrik is Senior Consulting Engineer with Cisco, but has served as an
advisor to
At 9:38 AM -0700 6/22/09, John R. Levine wrote:
> > The bootstrap question is addressed by requiring the end-user to know their
>> e-mail address and password. Based on the domain name, the implementation
>> would reach out to https://something.domain-name.tld and download the
>> relevant "schema"
Saw/and see the same problems here.
Vzb Oc3 in Chicago...
Normal business traffic dropped at around 9:45am CDT from 30-40mb/sec to
10mb/sec... lasted until roughly 10:30am CDT
Inbound connectivity from some areas of the country affected, but not all.
This seems to happen at least once every 90
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 1:38 PM, James Kennedy
(TT) wrote:
> Using there metro ethernet service we saw our circuit not recover after
> scheduled maintenance. Verizon backed out the change and our service was
> restored.
also, there are many heads on the verizon hydra, giving some clue as
to what
Using there metro ethernet service we saw our circuit not recover after
scheduled maintenance. Verizon backed out the change and our service was
restored.
- Original Message -
From: Michael Ulitskiy
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Mon Jun 22 12:32:48 2009
Subject: Re: verizon issue?
Can you
Can you be more specific about the problem saw?
We're having problems with their oc3 right now, not being able to push over
110m since this morning and still going on.
And sure can't get anything useful from verizon.
Thanks,
Michael
On Monday 22 June 2009 10:20:11 am James Kennedy (TT) wrote:
>
The bootstrap question is addressed by requiring the end-user to know their
e-mail address and password. Based on the domain name, the implementation
would reach out to https://something.domain-name.tld and download the
relevant "schema" and data for IMAP, SMTP, POP3, etc, in ordered priority.
Ba
Hey Everyone,
If anyone is using, in production, passive DWDM muxes / shelves with colored
1GigE or 10GigE optics in standard switches or routers drop me a private note?
I'm looking for real world examples for a white paper.
Thanks in Advance,
Vin
Thats e-mail client list covers less than 5% of my customer base and can't
be construed as a standard. =) Even Microsoft doesn't support it in Outlook
Express or Windows Mail.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Huff [mailto:mh...@ox.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 10:20 AM
To: 'fr
It already is used by Microsoft. Do a google for +Microsoft +Autodiscover.
It is used by Outlook for Windows, Entourage for Mac, the iPhone and Windows
Mobile devices. Like you suggested, it uses DNS based on the users email
address and looks for a series of resolvable addresses the easiest being
The bootstrap question is addressed by requiring the end-user to know their
e-mail address and password. Based on the domain name, the implementation
would reach out to https://something.domain-name.tld and download the
relevant "schema" and data for IMAP, SMTP, POP3, etc, in ordered priority.
Bas
>It's a pity that MAAWG or another group hasn't written a
>specification for the automatic downloading of configuration (with
>certificates, to be sure, for some kind of repudiation) and the
>update thereof, for adoption by the leading consumer e-mail clients.
MAAWG decided it's not in the standar
Yes,
They did some maintenance that I think went bad.
-Original Message-
From: sip vsp [mailto:sip.vsp.5...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 9:14 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: verizon issue?
Did anyone have trouble with Verizon over the weekend?
Did anyone have trouble with Verizon over the weekend?
Outlook supports Automatic Account Configuration, but unfortunately it seems
to be only for Outlook, not OE or WM.
It's a pity that MAAWG or another group hasn't written a specification for
the automatic downloading of configuration (with certificates, to be sure,
for some kind of repudiation) and
I would suggest to read RFC3901/BCP91: ³DNS IPv6 Transport Operational
Guidelines² on this topic.
- Alain.
On 6/21/09 5:45 PM, "joel jaeggli" wrote:
> In pratice, most clients are not their own recursive resolvers.
>
> Rui Ribeiro wrote:
>
>> >Hi Steve,
>> >
>> >An IPv6 only device can "
17 matches
Mail list logo
