Kevin Loch wrote:
> Seth Mattinen wrote:
>> Jay Hennigan wrote:
>>> "Tier 1", "tier 2" etc. are terms used primarily by salespeople, and
>>> don't have a lot to do with technical matters.
>>>
>>
>> Sure it does. If you're multihoming it will increase your AS path length.
>
> There is no general co
On Sep 11, 2009, at 6:23 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
I seem to get the impression that isis is preferred in the core. Any
reasons why folks dont prefer to go with ospf?
a bit harder to attack clnp (is-is) than ip (ospf)
is-is a bit simpler to configure, though you can get a sick as you
want. but d
I can tell you one reason IS-IS has been traditionally preferred over OSPFv2 is
due to it's use of TLVs, which makes IS-IS highly extensible and easy to
support new features. I remember when we first rolled out MPLS code on our
core routers at UUnet, support for traffic engineering extensions m
> I seem to get the impression that isis is preferred in the core. Any
> reasons why folks dont prefer to go with ospf?
a bit harder to attack clnp (is-is) than ip (ospf)
is-is a bit simpler to configure, though you can get a sick as you
want. but don't.
a bit simpler to code, so worked and was
I seem to get the impression that isis is preferred in the core. Any
reasons why folks dont prefer to go with ospf?
Glen
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> Unless you want your customers to have very substantial control over
>> your internal network, don't use an SPF IGP like
On 11 Sep, 2009, at 09:30, Serge Vautour wrote:
Hello,
We're in the process of planning for an MPLS network that will use
BGP for signaling between PEs. This will be a BGP free Core (i.e. no
BGP on the P routers). What are folks doing for iBGP in this case?
Full Mesh? Full Mesh the Main
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Jay Hennigan wrote:
"Tier 1", "tier 2" etc. are terms used primarily by salespeople, and
don't have a lot to do with technical matters.
Sure it does. If you're multihoming it will increase your AS path length.
There is no general correlation between AS path length and w
Hi there
The RR vs Full Mesh depends on what how you would like to balance your
exit/peering points across the network. If you have, say, 3 border
routers in 3 different regions, you should need at least 3 RRs if you
want each region having it's own preference for the external routes. I
would adv
andrew.clayba...@securian.com wrote:
> Hello - my company currently has two connections with a single tier 1 ISP.
> We are using the AS from our ISP at this time. In the next month we will
> be implementing a third connection with a second tier 1 ISP, so we will now
> be using our own AS number on
Jay Hennigan wrote:
>
> "Tier 1", "tier 2" etc. are terms used primarily by salespeople, and
> don't have a lot to do with technical matters.
>
Sure it does. If you're multihoming it will increase your AS path length.
~Seth
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:23 PM, David Conrad wrote:
> Marty,
>
>
> It's possible that not everything is above the table as well.
>>
>
> Actually, no. The whole point in publishing the algorithm IANA is using in
> allocating /8s is to allow anyone to verify for themselves we are following
> th
"Edible, self-replicating IP carriers are pretty special anyhow."
Mainstream IPv6 Here we come! ;)
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Richard Bennett wrote:
> If this news had come out a little earlier, some pigeon breeding programs
> may have qualified for broadband stimulus grants. Edible, self-
If this news had come out a little earlier, some pigeon breeding
programs may have qualified for broadband stimulus grants. Edible,
self-replicating IP carriers are pretty special anyhow.
Scott Weeks wrote:
--- n...@foobar.org wrote:
So, good news all around. Let's hope that IP over carrier p
--- n...@foobar.org wrote:
So, good news all around. Let's hope that IP over carrier pigeon will
soon become a thing of the past.
-
4GB = 32Gb
32Gb in 2 hours is 4.45Mbps. That's a pretty good DSL upstream bandwidth.
scott
The time should be measured in seconds for your BGP advertised prefixes
to propagate to most of the Internet. It may take longer for some
isolated ISP's to receive the routes. If you use the longest prefix
method to advertise to your preferred ISP, a convergence to the backup
ISP (where shorter pre
This says more about current ADSL technology not really being
"broadband" than it does about South Africa's telecommunications
infrastructure. Doing the arithmetic, my Southern California AT&T
384/1.5 ADSL connection would take approximately 23 hours to transmit 32
Gb (4 GB x 8) with the 384 Kbps u
This report has been generated at Fri Sep 11 21:11:39 2009 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
BGP Update Report
Interval: 03-Sep-09 -to- 10-Sep-09 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS919898231 9.2% 474.5 -- KAZTELECOM-AS Kazakhtelecom
Corporate Sales Administration
Folks,
The tentative agenda for NANOG47 is now available. See
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog47/agenda.php.
Looking forward to seeing you all in Dearborn.
Dave
(for the NANOG PC)
___
NANOG-announce
On 11/09/2009 21:13, William Herrin wrote:
180kbps is more or less middle-of-the-road for ADSL.
In terms of technology, it's about as close to bottom of the range as
you can get. The south african incumbent, Telkom, have three different
products, described here:
http://www.telkom.co.za/pro
andrew.clayba...@securian.com wrote:
Hello - my company currently has two connections with a single tier 1 ISP.
We are using the AS from our ISP at this time. In the next month we will
be implementing a third connection with a second tier 1 ISP, so we will now
be using our own AS number on all t
--- andrew.clayba...@securian.com wrote:
From: andrew.clayba...@securian.com
own AS number, how much downtime will there be? So far the second ISP has
only said that it could be hours for BGP to fully converge. We are looking
for more detail about how long the outage will be and how widespread
Hello - my company currently has two connections with a single tier 1 ISP.
We are using the AS from our ISP at this time. In the next month we will
be implementing a third connection with a second tier 1 ISP, so we will now
be using our own AS number on all three routers. My question is when we
Marty,
On Sep 10, 2009, at 2:45 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Not sure when ICANN got into the business of economic bailouts,
??
The blog posting implies it:
"AfriNIC and LACNIC have fewest IPv4 /8s and service the regions
with the most developing economies. We decided that those RIRs
shoul
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
> Note this part, though.
>
> ""Several recommendations have, in the past, been made to the
> customer but none of these have, to date, been accepted," Telkom's
> Troy Hector told South Africa's Sapa news agency in an e-mail."
>
> It would be nice
If you are interested in an Orion-Like system, but can't foot the bill
for it, maybe look at IpMonitor. Solarwinds acquired IpMonitor a while
back, so their sales reps will try to sell you on Orion.
I've had many years of good luck with it (IpMonitor) and Solarwinds
seems to be handling the soft
Drew Weaver wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Can anyone suggest a network monitoring system that knows the difference
> between a cisco 1701 and a GSR 12810/6500, etc?
>
> What I mean is, many times these days there are several different sub systems
> you have to monitor inside of a router/switch and not j
We use Cacti for this purpose, but it still requires creating custom
datasources for the vendor-specific SNMP MIBs.
+1 for cacti.
I think pretty much everything requires bringing in the mibs and setting
up mappings etc.
I've used Nagios/Cacti/Ganglia/MRTG.
Drew Weaver wrote:
Ah, I was mainly interested in an Orion like system that actually has all of
that kind of worked-in.
Yeah I got that. I am not aware of anything that does that. Not to say
it doesn't exist, but if it does it's somewhat well hidden.
http://www.frank4dd.com/howto/nagios/c
On Fri September 11 2009 13:59, Drew Weaver wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Can anyone suggest a network monitoring system that knows the difference
> between a cisco 1701 and a GSR 12810/6500, etc?
>
> What I mean is, many times these days there are several different sub
> systems you have to monitor inside o
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Charles Wyble wrote:
>
> It all comes down to SNMP to the best of my knowledge.
>
>
True. While you don't want the MRTG answer, I'd suggest looking at Cacti.
There's a large library of device profiles people have put together so as to
prevent you from having to hun
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 14:59 -0400, Drew Weaver wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Can anyone suggest a network monitoring system that knows the difference
> between a cisco 1701 and a GSR 12810/6500, etc?
>
> What I mean is, many times these days there are several different sub systems
> you have to monitor
Ah, I was mainly interested in an Orion like system that actually has all of
that kind of worked-in.
Thanks for the heads up.
-Drew
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wyble [mailto:char...@thewybles.com]
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 3:07 PM
To: Drew Weaver
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: I
Most of these threads usually result in telling the poster to RTFM with
a link to it :) I'm too lazy to link the manual. :)
c-nsp has extensive archives with lots of questions about various
specific SNMP mibs that weren't immediately evident from RTFM.
It all comes down to SNMP to the best of
Howdy,
Can anyone suggest a network monitoring system that knows the difference
between a cisco 1701 and a GSR 12810/6500, etc?
What I mean is, many times these days there are several different sub systems
you have to monitor inside of a router/switch and not just interface
utilization, the "
--- william.allen.simp...@gmail.com wrote:
From: William Allen Simpson
http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8248056.stm?ad=1
Update needed for RFC 1149 (1 April 1990),
A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams on Avian Carriers
---
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net
For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net.
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith .
Routing
An additional requirement often overlooked by Metro Ethernet architects
is to ensure that layer 3 multicast stateful protocols are implemented
in the carrier equipment. In order to ensure that PIM (S,G) stateful
packets are not flooded out all ports in customers'
geographically-dispersed switches,
Hello,
We're in the process of planning for an MPLS network that will use BGP for
signaling between PEs. This will be a BGP free Core (i.e. no BGP on the P
routers). What are folks doing for iBGP in this case? Full Mesh? Full Mesh the
Main POP PEs and Route Reflect to some outlining PEs? Are fo
On Sep 10, 2009, at 7:23 AM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
Olsen, Jason wrote:
Howdy all,
What I'm left thinking is that it would have been great if we'd had a
snapshot of our core routing table as it stood hours or even days
prior
to this event occurring, so that I could compare it with our cur
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 09:37 -0500, David Gower wrote:
> We are an ISP and one of our users webmail account was hacked into (poor
> passwd). Spam was sent out from it. We are black listed on Hotmail. I can't
> find anyway to get off their list. Who do I contact?
http://postmaster.live.com/ - it i
xbanc...@telconet.net (Xavier Banchon) wrote:
> Does anyone have issues with Internet connection through NAP of Americas?
Yes - there's obviously been some failure on the DC power, which
took the peering grid down (and a few ISPs, too). Session's have
come up again around an hour ago.
Btw - a
We do have problems since 13:27 CET
BR
Philipp
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Xavier Banchon [mailto:xbanc...@telconet.net]
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. September 2009 15:11
An: nanog@nanog.org
Betreff: NAP of Americas
Hi Fellows,
Does anyone have issues with Internet connection through NA
We are an ISP and one of our users webmail account was hacked into (poor
passwd). Spam was sent out from it. We are black listed on Hotmail. I can't
find anyway to get off their list. Who do I contact?
Thanks
David Gower
President
Gower Computer Support, Inc.
903 597-9220
Hi Fellows,
Does anyone have issues with Internet connection through NAP of Americas?
Kind Regards,
Xavier
Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Movistar
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:36:34 -0400
Jeff Kell wrote:
> William Allen Simpson wrote:
> >
> > http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8248056.stm?ad=1
> >
> >
> > Update needed for RFC 1149 (1 April 1990),
> > A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams on Avi
On 09/11/2009 06:36 AM, Jeff Kell wrote:
William Allen Simpson wrote:
http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8248056.stm?ad=1
Update needed for RFC 1149 (1 April 1990),
A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams on Avian Carriers
Truly practical wit
William Allen Simpson wrote:
>
> http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8248056.stm?ad=1
>
>
> Update needed for RFC 1149 (1 April 1990),
> A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams on Avian Carriers
Truly practical with today's storage media... if the W
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 05:43:07 -0400
William Allen Simpson wrote:
>
> http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8248056.stm?ad=1
Twenty five years ago we said "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a
station wagon full of mag tapes hurtling down the highway." The
Yes AT&T is having a major outage affecting both data and voice.
* * * * *
Allen Bass
Manager, Technology Operations
Arise Virtual Solutions Inc.
3450 Lakeside Drive, Suite 620
Miramar, Florida 33027
www.arise.com
-Original Message-
From: Wolfgang Nagele [mailto:wnag...@ripe.net]
Sent:
Hi,
> Anybody seeing peerings down at NAP Miami (198.32.124.0/23)?
Just recovered. Outage lasted about 1 hour.
Regards,
Wolfgang
Major DC power issues at the NOTA.
Robert D. Scott rob...@ufl.edu
Senior Network Engineer 352-273-0113 Phone
CNS - Network Services 352-392-2061 CNS Phone Tree
University of Florida 352-392-9440 FAX
Florida Lambda Rail 352-294-3571 FLR NOC
Gai
Hi,
Anybody seeing peerings down at NAP Miami (198.32.124.0/23)?
Regards,
Wolfgang
Benjamin Billon wrote:
>
>> Why don't we just blacklist everything and only whitelist those we know
>> are good?
>>
>>> Note we all could start using IPv6 and avoid this problem altogether.
>>
> Yeah. When ISP will start receiving SMTP traffic in IPv6, they could
> start to accept whiteliste
Peter Beckman wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
>> What a load of rubbish. How is ARIN or any RIR/LIR supposed to
>> know the intent of use?
>
> Why don't we just blacklist everything and only whitelist those we know
> are good?
>
> Because the cost of determining who is
Olsen, Jason wrote:
> Howdy all,
> What I'm left thinking is that it would have been great if we'd had a
> snapshot of our core routing table as it stood hours or even days prior
> to this event occurring, so that I could compare it with our current
> "broken" state, so the team could have seen
http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8248056.stm?ad=1
Update needed for RFC 1149 (1 April 1990),
A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams on Avian Carriers
Does anyone have best practise for implementing those technologies ?
I am currently doing a testing LAB with CISCO REP since i have a few Metro on
hand.
It works quite well in my LAB. There is one Request Time Out if the link break
BUT it is physical layer not REP :)
_
58 matches
Mail list logo
