On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
> Hmm...the ones I've been involved with have to go through an
> independent third party audit to ensure that they are compliant. The
the pci-is-good/sux (and sas-70 is-good/sux) discussion seems out of
nanog scope, to me... but really PCI c
Fabio,
I believe there are several companies that build equipment based on the
802.17B standard. I will be more than glad to list them if you want.
I was quite involved in IEEE 802.17 during the standardization up till
2005. What are you looking for in the case studies?
I can go at length on
Hmm...the ones I've been involved with have to go through an
independent third party audit to ensure that they are compliant. The
independent auditor has to agree that they're practices are secure and
satisfies the credit card company's security objectives.
If it were that loose you'd see a lot mo
In article you write:
>On that same note, can someone point me in the direction of an SMS
>gateway service? I would like to be able to send SMS messages from my
>monitoring systems, but I am unsure about how to go about it.
If your monitoring system has reliable IP connectivity, I can recomme
Most of our customers just make up their own definition of PCI and
then demand that we help them adhere to it.
Jeff
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Jay Farrell wrote:
> Yes, but with PCI compliance the powers that be (credit card
> companies) can actually fine you big bucks for being non-compli
Yes, but with PCI compliance the powers that be (credit card
companies) can actually fine you big bucks for being non-compliant.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=pci+compliance+fines&aq=f&oq=&aqi=g1g-m1
http://www.pcicomplianceguide.org/pcifaqs.php#11
Cheers,
Jayfar
On Tue, Sep 22
People buy SAS 70 compliant anything just because it's the latest
buzzword, kind of like PCI compliance.
Jeff
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:52 PM, John Curran wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Andy Ashley wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would really appreciate any recommendations for SAS70 Type II com
On Sep 22, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Andy Ashley wrote:
Hi,
I would really appreciate any recommendations for SAS70 Type II
compliant colocation providers in Chicago, IL
Andy -
As an FYI, SAS 70 Type II compliance means whatever that
provider's "SAS 70 Type II" audit document states for cont
On 23/09/2009, at 4:29 AM, William Herrin wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Scott Berkman
wrote:
Some people use a serial interface to a specific model cell phones to
directly send the message over the carrier's cellular network.
This is good
in the event of isolation of a location
Many people responded to me directly, so I thought I would summarize
my findings.
1) AT&T Customer Service never returned my call, despite saying they
would. I guess they couldn't get to the right folks. The occasional
curse of being in a really large company.
2) A very kind inside AT&T person
William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Shane Ronan wrote:
>
>> How do I send out an email if the network is down?
>
> I have had success using a GSM phone hooked up to the server via USB.
> (Bonus is that the server constantly 'charges' the phone). An ugly set
> of scripts deal
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Shane Ronan wrote:
How do I send out an email if the network is down?
I have had success using a GSM phone hooked up to the server via USB.
(Bonus is that the server constantly 'charges' the phone). An ugly set of
scripts deals with taking emails and changing them into
Point of note: NONE of the cellular carriers treat SMS messages as "data".
SMS messaging is carried on the "Control" channel that works similar to the
"D" channel on a PRI
Aaron D. Osgood
Streamline Solutions L.L.C
P.O. Box 6115
Falmouth, ME 04105
TEL: 207-781-5561
FAX: 615-704-8067
MOBILE: 20
Le mardi 22 septembre 2009 à 16:27 -0400, Shane Ronan a écrit :
> How do I send out an email if the network is down?
>
via a gsm modem (phone + usb cable) connect to you monitoring server.
> On Sep 22, 2009, at 11:52 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:
>
> > Shane Ronan wrote:
> >
> >> On that same not
We have a package which uses the MultiTech line of modems coupled with
software that will watch files on your network and generate SMS messges (or
SNPP, WCTP, TAP, FAX, etc). The underlying engine is a highly customized
version of PageGate software from NotePage, Inc. Part of our customization
was
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 03:31:48PM -0500, Brandon Galbraith wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Shane Ronan wrote:
>
> > How do I send out an email if the network is down?
> >
> >
> Why not use an e-mail to SMS gateway from whichever carrier?
> >>
> >
> >
> Your external monitoring box send
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Shane Ronan wrote:
> How do I send out an email if the network is down?
>
>
Why not use an e-mail to SMS gateway from whichever carrier?
>>
>
>
Your external monitoring box sends the email? You do have something doing
external monitoring, right?
--
Brandon Galb
How do I send out an email if the network is down?
On Sep 22, 2009, at 11:52 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:
Shane Ronan wrote:
On that same note, can someone point me in the direction of an SMS
gateway service? I would like to be able to send SMS messages from
my monitoring systems, but I am uns
Once upon a time, William Herrin said:
> The Multitech Multimodem GPRS model MTCBA-G-EN-F4 has an ethernet
> port. Add a SIM card from your favorite wireless carrier and you can
> send and receive SMS messages via "AT" commands over a TCP socket.
> Problem is, it seizes up or otherwise founders ev
Once upon a time, Alex Balashov said:
> Shane Ronan wrote:
> >On that same note, can someone point me in the direction of an SMS
> >gateway service? I would like to be able to send SMS messages from my
> >monitoring systems, but I am unsure about how to go about it.
>
> Why not use an e-mail to
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009, Philip Lavine wrote:
> To all,
>
> I am running a Windows based high performance computing application that uses
> "reliable" multicast (29West) on a gigabit LAN. All systems are logically on
> the same VLAN and even on the same physical switch The application is set to
>
--- Shane Ronan wrote:
On that same note, can someone point me in the direction of an SMS
gateway service? I would like to be able to send SMS messages from my
monitoring systems, but I am unsure about how to go about it.
--- end of quote ---
There are several ways to do this:
- Open source soft
FYI here is one view of one of the threads I was recalling:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/104612?search_string=sms;#
104612
Make sure to look at post #5 that summarized a previous thread too.
I think the "direct connection" I was thinking of was the modem to TAP
gateway optio
To all,
I am running a Windows based high performance computing application that uses
"reliable" multicast (29West) on a gigabit LAN. All systems are logically on
the same VLAN and even on the same physical switch The application is set to
use an 8k buffer and therefore results in IP fragmentat
> -Original Message-
> From: Vasil Kolev [mailto:va...@ludost.net]
>
> What I need is something that can handle something like 24 10gbit ports
> - 10-12 to switches with the serving equipment (each one of them
> pushing around 8-9Gbit) and on the other side connected to a few ISPs,
> some
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Scott Berkman wrote:
> Some people use a serial interface to a specific model cell phones to
> directly send the message over the carrier's cellular network. This is good
> in the event of isolation of a location from any IP connectivity to a
> carrier gateway.
Hi all,
I've been banging my head for a while and finally decided to ask for a
recommendation for a router for a somewhat weird situation.
What we currently have is a number of 10G ethernet ports to one carrier,
just switches and nothing more, the carrier is the gw for all the
servers we have (ev
On Sep 21, 2009, at 2:01 PM, William Pitcock wrote:
On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 18:18 +0200, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
Hello Nanog,
I'm looking into a weird request which more and more customers have.
They want "different Class C addresses", by which they mean IPs in
different /24 subnets.
The ap
Another for this list is http://msgme.com/.
Setting up your own short codes is an expensive and long process, so you are
usually best starting off with a shared code from one of these companies and
you can migrate down the line if the revenue/volume is there to make it
worthwhile.
-Scott
Many people consider these (carrier email to SMS gateways) too unreliable as
there are no SLAs from the carriers, and sometimes experience long delays in
message delivery, or just flat out dropped messages. If this is what you
are depending on for outage notification that's a big risk.
Some peopl
Hi,
I would really appreciate any recommendations for SAS70 Type II
compliant colocation providers in Chicago, IL
The requirement is fairly small (1/2 - 1 rack). Mail me off list please.
Thanks.
Regards,
Andy.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanne
Shane Ronan wrote:
On that same note, can someone point me in the direction of an SMS
gateway service? I would like to be able to send SMS messages from my
monitoring systems, but I am unsure about how to go about it.
Appreciate the assistance.
Why not use an e-mail to SMS gateway from whic
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Nick Colton wrote:
>Cisco has been recommending the Cisco 7600 as our core router. My concern
>is that cisco told us that in the event of an RSP failover the 7600 could take
>up to
>30 seconds to begin routing packets again, this seems wrong to me since my
>old E
Shaun,
This is called "Short code sms messaging". www.clickatell.com offers this
service and is considered to be one of the bigger players in the SMS market.
Warm regards,
Tom Walsh
Express Web Systems, Inc.
> -Original Message-
> From: Shaun Rossi [mailto:ro...@fidalia.com]
> Sent: Tue
On that same note, can someone point me in the direction of an SMS
gateway service? I would like to be able to send SMS messages from my
monitoring systems, but I am unsure about how to go about it.
Appreciate the assistance.
Shane Ronan
On Sep 22, 2009, at 11:19 AM, Express Web Systems wro
"Short-codes" it is!
Thanks everyone,
-Shaun
Shaun Rossi
Fidalia Networks Inc
tel. (905) 271-0037 x 111
1-866-FIDALIA (343-2542) x 111
fax. (905) 271-1036
1 Port Street East - Second Floor
Mississauga, Ontario
L5G 4N1 Canada
> Hello,
>
> I have no idea what this is referred to as, so I will try
> to explain: I have a client interested in setting up a
> mobile phone text message service where a mobile user
> would send a text to a short (say 5 digit) 'telephone'
> number. I've seen commercials on TV w
Good luck. Google doesn't disclose their algorithms. There doesn't
appear to be any Google statement on this matter, either.
No, but for "honest" folks, they do provide guidelines :
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769
One can't really fault Google for tak
Hello,
I have no idea what this is referred to as, so I will try to
explain: I have a client interested in setting up a mobile phone text message
service where a mobile user would send a text to a short (say 5 digit)
'telephone' number. I've seen commercials on TV where you co
> On a similar issue, I have a debate going on in my company about SEO
> and links coming from IP blocks allocated from different upstream
> providers will improve page ranks. (So, if I have block A from
> provider 1 and block B from provider 2, web sites linking each other
> on block A & B, the r
* Sebastian Wiesinger:
> I'm looking into a weird request which more and more customers have.
> They want "different Class C addresses", by which they mean IPs in
> different /24 subnets.
It's not that weired at all. Others demand the same because it
allegedly increases reliability.
> My questi
On a similar issue, I have a debate going on in my company about SEO
and links coming from IP blocks allocated from different upstream
providers will improve page ranks. (So, if I have block A from
provider 1 and block B from provider 2, web sites linking each other
on block A & B, the rank will g
j...@seminte.lt wrote:
Hello fellow NANOGers. Slightly offtopic, but I would greatly appreciate
your suggestions. For my telecommunications engineering degree I am
designing a TDM data analyzer, and I need suggestion, what you would
like in
an appliance like that.
Right now my idea is that it
This question would likely be better answered on cisco-nsp.
But the asr9k provides a better roadmap than the 7600/6500 platform.
These are now quite old platforms in the overall lifecycle. The 9k
also runs xr which is either an asset or liability depending on your
network.
Me? I always wa
Hello fellow NANOGers. Slightly offtopic, but I would greatly appreciate
your suggestions. For my telecommunications engineering degree I am
designing a TDM data analyzer, and I need suggestion, what you would like in
an appliance like that.
Right now my idea is that it should be a transparent de
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
>
> It would be nice to know what those recommendations were...
>
>
Excuse the delayed reply from a SA person :)
I'm guessing the recommendations were not to use an asymmetrical service for
trying to upload large amounts of data.
Ironically th
46 matches
Mail list logo
