The SC is scheduled to vote on Tuesday 10/6 for charter amendments to
include on this year's ballot.
The current list is at http://www.nanog.org/charter, and has been
significantly revised:
- There is actual ballot text.
- The ballot text for the proposal to change the MLC to the
Dear Colleagues,
Sorry for the late response.
The problem was due to faulty firmware on one of our Alaxala routers.
We resolved the problem the same day (Aug. 18) by downgrading firmware.
For more details, please see Alaxala page here (English):
I received an alert from Cyclops telling me a probe in AS513 had seen a
/32 that I announce to Cogent for one of our BGP sessions.
Did anyone else see this?
We had a problem with cogent about a year ago. Somehow.. cymru was
announcing a /32 of ours and black holing it for whatever reason. It
was removed but wasn't happy that cogent was allowing cymru to do this
sort of action. To this date we do not have a valid reason from cogent
on why they
We had a problem with cogent about a year ago. Somehow.. cymru was
announcing a /32 of ours and black holing it for whatever reason. It
was removed but wasn't happy that cogent was allowing cymru to do this
sort of action. To this date we do not have a valid reason from cogent
on why they
We're getting a slew of complaints from folks on SNET DSL links in
Connecticut that can't reach two of our prefixes. If anyone at AS
7132 is listening and willing to contact me off-list, I can fill you
in. The usual support channels aren't yielding much at the moment.
Is anyone else
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, ML wrote:
I received an alert from Cyclops telling me a probe in AS513 had seen a /32
that I announce to Cogent for one of our BGP sessions.
Did anyone else see this?
Are you relying on the /24 filtering everybody does, or did you announce
it to them with NO-EXPORT set?
Yes, I absolutely love the /24 filtering everybody does. Internet
littering at its best.
http://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-badpfx-nos
Clue
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.sewrote:
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, ML wrote:
I received an alert from Cyclops telling me a
If there is DDoS attack going on from/to specific /32, sometimes they do
that to avoid too much overload for the network.
Cogent should give the answer for what's going on.
Alex
Zak Thompson wrote:
We had a problem with cogent about a year ago. Somehow.. cymru was
announcing a /32 of ours
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net
For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net.
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith
Is anyone having trouble routing to 208.71.177.15 or 208.71.179.10?
Can't get there from 65.59.112.0/24 in Chicago.
David
Anyone from Fairpoint on this list know of any issues with DSL
subscribers in the New England area?
We lost visibility of our customers using Fairpoint, but I'm still
receiving routes from our peering partners.
Scott Wolfe
Cybera, Inc
Anyone notice anything bizarre with ATT in New York? We had our cage
at 811 10th Avenue (advertised by AS7018) unreachable from several
other providers for about 20 minutes, it just recently came back.
At the same time, we lost MPLS service (not link, forwarding across
the cloud) at another site
Something seems to be flapping at the IP layer. BGP is steady, but
IP reachablity is intermittent, irrespective of using L3 or VZN for
out outbound path.
David
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Tatsuya Kawasaki tkawas...@fbr.com wrote:
We are in DC area, we lost connection to several
We lost our OC3 to Verizon Business in Boston. All of the BGP routes
were still flowing to us, causing routing black holes. We had to kill
the BGP session on our end.
Our VoIP phone provider, based in Boston also with a Verizon Business
pipe, also had a call queue that was completely stuffed. Not
Looks like our sites are back as well.
-Scott W
On Oct 2, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Josh Cheney josh.che...@gmail.com wrote:
Scott Wolfe wrote:
Anyone from Fairpoint on this list know of any issues with DSL
subscribers in the New England area?
In New England, on a Verizon Business T1 (Fairpoint is
We are here in DC with VZ, we lost connection to a few sites including
to India.
Tatsuya
Tatsuya Kawasaki
703.469.1311 (24x7)
-Original Message-
From: Christopher J. Pilkington
[mailto:christopher.j.pilking...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 4:01 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Thanks for the update.
-Scott W
On Oct 2, 2009, at 3:06 PM, David Storandt dstora...@teljet.com
wrote:
We lost our OC3 to Verizon Business in Boston. All of the BGP routes
were still flowing to us, causing routing black holes. We had to kill
the BGP session on our end.
Our VoIP phone
We're getting weird approachability issues on some of out networks,
losing IP path without BGP changes.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Christopher J. Pilkington
christopher.j.pilking...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone notice anything bizarre with ATT in New York? We had our cage
at 811 10th Avenue
This just in from outa...@outages.org:. Seems to be related to issues a
number of people are experiencing ...
We just opened a ticket with Verizon and were informed of outages for Verizon
on East Coast.
-Original
Scott Wolfe wrote:
Anyone from Fairpoint on this list know of any issues with DSL
subscribers in the New England area?
In New England, on a Verizon Business T1 (Fairpoint is the ILEC), and we
just had some connectivity issues that lasted about 30 min. They seem to
be resolved now.
Josh
--
-Original Message-
From: Christopher J. Pilkington [mailto:christopher.j.pilking...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 4:01 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: BGP or MPLS issue ATT in New York?
Anyone notice anything bizarre with ATT in New York? We had our cage
at 811 10th Avenue
ML m...@kenweb.org writes:
I received an alert from Cyclops telling me a probe in AS513 had seen
a /32 that I announce to Cogent for one of our BGP sessions.
Did anyone else see this?
cyclops alerted me that the /32s my routers use got announced. I'm still
tying to figure out what's up.
We are in NH and I'm seeing issues with L3 and uunet. BGP seems fine but
our customers have having issues connecting to us from other providers.
Jeremy
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 13:09 -0700, David Hiers wrote:
We're getting weird approachability issues on some of out networks,
losing IP path
We're back up now.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Wallace Keith kwall...@pcconnection.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Christopher J. Pilkington [mailto:christopher.j.pilking...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 4:01 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: BGP or MPLS issue
Seen from a dtag.de customer
traceroute to 208.71.179.10 (208.71.179.10), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 yttrium.anul.nsa (7.19.30.39) 3 ms 0 ms 0 ms
2 217.0.116.228 (217.0.116.228) 45 ms 47 ms 48 ms
3 217.0.78.58 (217.0.78.58) 46 ms 45 ms 46 ms
4 217.239.40.70 (217.239.40.70)
Le vendredi 02 octobre 2009 à 10:54 -0500, Clue Store a écrit :
Yes, I absolutely love the /24 filtering everybody does. Internet
littering at its best.
http://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-badpfx-nos
Yes, nice...
mh
Clue
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson
Le vendredi 02 octobre 2009 à 11:01 -0500, Alex H. Ryu a écrit :
If there is DDoS attack going on from/to specific /32, sometimes they do
that to avoid too much overload for the network.
Cogent should give the answer for what's going on.
Generally, such is kept in-AS (null-routing or routing
I called cogent. Best guess is that they leaked the /32 announcements
that people do for the peer a/b stuff. They normally filter them, and
don't have any recommendation about whether or not to set no export.
seph
seph s...@directionless.org writes:
ML m...@kenweb.org writes:
I received an
BGP Update Report
Interval: 24-Sep-09 -to- 01-Oct-09 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS919845161 3.3% 118.2 -- KAZTELECOM-AS Kazakhtelecom
Corporate Sales Administration
This report has been generated at Fri Oct 2 21:11:14 2009 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 10:54:13AM -0500, Clue Store wrote:
Yes, I absolutely love the /24 filtering everybody does. Internet
littering at its best.
http://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-badpfx-nos
There is no rule that says you have to filter at /24, or that no other
network may ever
Since we're on the topic of what's commonly accepted in IPv4 land (a
/24), what's the story in IPv6 land? It seems to me that a /32 is a fur
sure thing, but others will accept down to a /48, too.
~Seth
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:29:25 -0700
From: Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us
Since we're on the topic of what's commonly accepted in IPv4 land (a
/24), what's the story in IPv6 land? It seems to me that a /32 is a fur
sure thing, but others will accept down to a /48, too.
Depends on the
A friend of mine has services on through yieldbook (in new York) that
he accesses from Santa Barbara. He noticed he couldn't get to them
around 2pm via his Cox cable inet link, dieing after
gar9.n54ny.ip.ATT.net (12.122.131.245), but from his Verizon link, he
had no issues. The problem persists
Given that ARIN issues /48s to multihomed end users, I think it would
be wise to accept them.
Owen
On Oct 2, 2009, at 4:29 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Since we're on the topic of what's commonly accepted in IPv4 land (a
/24), what's the story in IPv6 land? It seems to me that a /32 is a
fur
Owen DeLong wrote:
Given that ARIN issues /48s to multihomed end users, I think it would
be wise to accept them.
True, although 2620:0::/23 is still a black hole for some. When did ARIN
start using it, 2007?
~Seth
This isn't an IP-related call for help, but hopefully someone on here
from Verizon is listening or knows someone who can help me.
On May 5 I was in touch with account manager J from Verizon who quoted
me and set me up with an Ethernet-delivered circuit. The order was
placed with implementations
On May 5 I was in touch with account manager J from Verizon who quoted
me and set me up with an Ethernet-delivered circuit. The order was
placed with implementations manager N. Somewhere during the time it took
them between May and July to install the fiber, N dropped off the face
of the
Extract:
This is the Postfix program at host sec.phx.gblx.net.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster
If you do so, please include this problem
40 matches
Mail list logo
