On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, Mark Newton wrote:
On 03/12/2009, at 9:51 AM, Dave Temkin wrote:
You're correct, out of the box there aren't many. The first couple that come
to mind are the Apple Airport Express and Airport Extreme, but I don't believe
Linksys/Netgear/etc. have support out of the bo
Wade Peacock wrote:
> We had a discussion today about IPv6 today. During our open thinking the
> topic of client equipment came up.
> We all commented that we have not seen any consumer grade IPv6 enable
> internet gateways (routers/firewalls), a kin to the ever popular Linksys
> 54G series, DLin
Mohacsi Janos wrote:
According to Apple the latest Apple Airport Extreme does support
DHCPv6 prefix delegation and native IPv6 uplink not only 6to4.
Airports don't support DHCPv6 PD yet. I'm led to believe that they may
in the future from my Apple friends but not yet.
MMC
A list of CPEs, routers, firewalls and other hardware and software are at
http://www.ipv6-to-standard.org/
César Olvera
-Original Message-
From: Wade Peacock [mailto:wade.peac...@sunwave.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 5:16 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Consumer Grade - IPV6
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
(And before anybody asks, yes ~all is what we want, and no you can't ask us
to try -all instead, unless we're allowed to send you all the helpdesk calls
about misconfigured migratory laptops".. ;)
While I'll remain neutral about the specifics o
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
Mohacsi Janos wrote:
According to Apple the latest Apple Airport Extreme does support DHCPv6
prefix delegation and native IPv6 uplink not only 6to4.
Airports don't support DHCPv6 PD yet. I'm led to believe that they may in
the future fro
> From: Mark Newton [mailto:new...@internode.com.au]
> On 03/12/2009, at 9:51 AM, Dave Temkin wrote:
>
> > You're correct, out of the box there aren't many. The first couple that
> > come to mind are the Apple Airport Express and Airport Extreme, but I
don't
> > believe Linksys/Netgear/etc. have
There appears to be a Comcast outage in central NJ, more specifically in
the South Brunswick area. Comcast appears to be aware of the outage as
per the message I got when I called them. Anyone hear any details on
the issue, or an ETA for repair yet?
Jeffrey
On 03/12/2009, at 22:46, "TJ" wrote:
From: Mark Newton [mailto:new...@internode.com.au]
On 03/12/2009, at 9:51 AM, Dave Temkin wrote:
You're correct, out of the box there aren't many. The first
couple that
come to mind are the Apple Airport Express and Airport Extreme,
but I
don't
bel
Update - Comcast repaired the problem. Not sure if there are other
areas still with problems though.
Jeffrey
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Negro [mailto:jne...@billtrust.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 8:04 AM
To: NANOG
Subject: Comcast outage in central NJ
There appears to b
On 2 Dec 2009, at 20:46, Lasher, Donn wrote:
This year I've been seeing what appears to be an increasing trend
among
service providers.. making the decision to leave public peering.
Peering is often sold as 'cheaper than transit' - for everyone that is
a gross generalisation, for many net
There was a total outage for 6+ hours in at least one Richmond VA
neighborhood yesterday, ending around 6:00PM.
Cable STB software had clearly been updated when everything came back
up, but I have no idea whether the two events were related.
TV
On Dec 3, 2009, at 9:27 AM, Jeffrey Negro wrote
>Check out this report on the success of peering :
>https://www.euro-ix.net/member/m/document/showDocument/id/158
This seems to be a protected document behind login-only section of the
site. Can anyone comment on wether the document should be publically
accessible? Would love to spread it ar
We are seeing a large number of tcp connection attempts to ports known to have
security issues. The source addresses are spoofed from our address range. They
are easy to block at our border router obviously, but the number and volume is
a bit worrisome. Our upstream providers appear to be uninte
For over a month now I've been fighting with Comcast Customer Security
Assurance regarding a simple BlackList issue. Apparently there is some
disconnect between internal applications and their ability to report
BlackList status accurately and the 'actual' BlackList rule-set. Supposedly
the ticket h
* Matthew Huff:
> We are seeing a large number of tcp connection attempts to ports
> known to have security issues. The source addresses are spoofed from
> our address range. They are easy to block at our border router
> obviously, but the number and volume is a bit worrisome. Our
> upstream provi
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Huff [mailto:mh...@ox.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 12:05 PM
>
> but the number and volume is a bit worrisome. Our upstream providers
> appear to be uninterested in tracing or blocking them. Is this the new
> normal?
Yes, it's the new norm..
I recently found out that the Adobe Flash Media Server (FMS) can
operate "out of the box"
as an open proxy, enabling other people to steal server resources and
bandwidth. Furthermore,
I also found that there is an ecosystem of pirates taking advantage of
this "feature" to
illegally stream spo
The source address appears to be fixed as well as the source port (),
scanning different destinations and ports.
Matthew Huff | One Manhattanville Rd
OTA Management LLC | Purchase, NY 10577
http://www.ox.com | Phone: 914-460-4039
aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-460-4139
-Ori
H..
This is most interesting. Have you spoken with Adobe about the issue? I don't
have an immediate handle on how they have reacted to security issues in the
past.
Sane defaults would be nice. :(
You might want to ping Akami as they have substantial operational experience
with flash medi
On Dec 3, 2009, at 9:53 AM, Matthew Huff wrote:
> The source address appears to be fixed as well as the source port (),
> scanning different destinations and ports.
>
>
Some script kiddies found nmap and decided to target you for some reason. It
happens. It's annoying.
I'm not at all concerned about door-knob twisting or network scanning. What
concerns me is that the source addresses are spoofed from our address range and
that our upstream providers aren't willing to even look at the problem.
Matthew Huff | One Manhattanville Rd
OTA Management LLC
Preemptive action or smart move ?
http://googlecode.blogspot.com/2009/12/introducing-google-public-dns-new-dns.html
Cool IP address to remember though (8.8.8.8)
Cheers
Jorge
Marshall,
Did you find out via published article, or your own research?
Either way I'd like (if you don't mind) more information on this so I
can investigate what impact there may be on our systems.
Thanks!
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
I recently found out that the Adobe Flash Media Server (FMS
Hi,
now Google DNS, anything more?
http://googlecode.blogspot.com/2009/12/introducing-google-public-dns-new-dns.html
Eduardo.-
--
Eduardo A. Suarez
Facultad de Ciencias Astronomicas y Geofisicas
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
> now Google DNS, anything more?
GoogleNation.
Cheers
Jorge
On Dec 3, 2009, at 1:09 PM, Ray Sanders wrote:
Marshall,
Did you find out via published article, or your own research?
Either way I'd like (if you don't mind) more information on this so
I can investigate what impact there may be on our systems.
Via a DMCA take-down letter for a Cricket
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Chris Owen [mailto:ow...@hubris.net]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Dezember 2009 07:25
> An: NANOG list
> Betreff: Re: AT&T SMTP Admin contact?
>
> On Dec 2, 2009, at 9:52 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>
> > It only stops forgery if the SPF record ha
8.8.8.8 6.6.6.6 would have been really really funny. :)
On Dec 3, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>> now Google DNS, anything more?
>
> GoogleNation.
>
> Cheers
> Jorge
>
Jorge Amodio wrote:
>> now Google DNS, anything more?
>
> GoogleNation.
>
No kiddng. I must be the only one who is getting tired of seeing Google
take over literally everything.
~Seth
GoogleWave?
Regards,
Xavier
-Mensaje original-
De: Jorge Amodio [mailto:jmamo...@gmail.com]
Enviado el: Jueves, 03 de Diciembre de 2009 13:21
Para: Eduardo A. Suárez
CC: nanog@nanog.org
Asunto: Re: news from Google
> now Google DNS, anything more?
GoogleNation.
Cheers
Jorge
smime.p
when is the European Union going to sue them for anti-trust, ala
Microsoft?
-Original Message-
From: Seth Mattinen [mailto:se...@rollernet.us]
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 1:49 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: news from Google
Jorge Amodio wrote:
>> now Google DNS, anything mor
Excerpts from Charles Wyble's message of Thu Dec 03 10:44:49 -0800 2009:
> 8.8.8.8 6.6.6.6 would have been really really funny. :)
Nice IPs from Level 3, huh?
6.6.6.6 belongs to the US Army.
--j
uf, another question I'll have ask my users now:
User: I can't get to the intranet.mycompanydomain.local! What did you
break!?
Me: Hey, you can't to the intranet,domain.local? Did you make your laptop
use Google DNS?
-
Andrey Gordon [andrey.gor...@gmail.com]
For sure...everyone remembers the Bill Gates Borg picture, but at this
rate, Google will soon become the new poster child for that picture (or
something comparable).
Bret
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 10:48 -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> No kiddng. I must be the only one who is getting tired of seein
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Bret Clark wrote:
> For sure...everyone remembers the Bill Gates Borg picture, but at this
> rate, Google will soon become the new poster child for that picture (or
> something comparable).
>
> Bret
>
>
I try to think of them as a benevolent dictator ;)
-brandon
Sent from my iPhone, please excuse any errors.
On Dec 3, 2009, at 13:08, Andrey Gordon wrote:
uf, another question I'll have ask my users now:
User: I can't get to the intranet.mycompanydomain.local! What did you
break!?
Me: Hey, you can't to the intranet,domain.local? Did you make your
lap
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Jorge Amodio wrote:
now Google DNS, anything more?
I'm surprised that Google's new DNS service does not return better results
for google.com than some local DNS resolvers do. My server is in Fairfax,
VA. Does Google use Anycast'ed IPs or is it sti
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 01:51:05PM -0500, Kain, Becki (B.) wrote:
>
> when is the European Union going to sue them for anti-trust, ala
> Microsoft?
More optional anycasted resolvers are somehow bad? [well, for
simpleminded geolocation maybe] Just another pair to slot
alongside L3's and OpenDN
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Bret Clark wrote:
> For sure...everyone remembers the Bill Gates Borg picture, but at this
> rate, Google will soon become the new poster child for that picture (or
> something comparable).
>
> Bret
>
>
> On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 10:48 -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
>
>
http://www.collegehumor.com/article:1793643
--bill
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 02:12:58PM -0500, Bret Clark wrote:
> For sure...everyone remembers the Bill Gates Borg picture, but at this
> rate, Google will soon become the new poster child for that picture (or
> something comparable).
>
> Bret
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 10:53:46 -0500 Ken Chase wrote:
>> Check out this report on the success of peering :
>> https://www.euro-ix.net/member/m/document/showDocument/id/158
> This seems to be a protected document behind login-only section of the
> site. Can anyone comment on wether the document shou
> I think of this as an obvious (not necessarily beneficial for all, of
> course) step for a company which lives out of advertisement - i.e. what if
> they could capture your habits for browsing at the FQDN-to-IP time -
> wouldn't that add more to their knowledge base?
They have a lot of smart peo
> I think of this as an obvious (not necessarily beneficial for all, of
> course) step for a company which lives out of advertisement - i.e. what
> if
> they could capture your habits for browsing at the FQDN-to-IP time -
> wouldn't that add more to their knowledge base?
>
I think there are amazi
Stefan wrote:
>
> I think of this as an obvious (not necessarily beneficial for all, of
> course) step for a company which lives out of advertisement - i.e. what if
> they could capture your habits for browsing at the FQDN-to-IP time -
> wouldn't that add more to their knowledge base?
>
I'm cert
Just wanted to announce that we published a handy little tool for those
either already, or interested in, peering at an European IXP(s).
The Euro-IX ASN filter allows one to make use of our IXP database that
contains more than 4.800 ASNs that peer at IXPs around Europe. You can see
which ASNs peer
Eduardo A. Suárez wrote:
Hi,
now Google DNS, anything more?
http://googlecode.blogspot.com/2009/12/introducing-google-public-dns-new-dns.html
Eduardo.-
yawn. So not interested.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Chris Owen wrote:
> On Dec 2, 2009, at 9:52 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>
>> It only stops forgery if the SPF record has a -all in it (as hubris.net
>> does).
>> However, a lot of domains (mine included) have a ~all instead.
>
> I guess I've never really see
Also reminds me of the Level 3 DNS servers in the 4.2.2.[1-8++] range.
-Scott
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Lassoff [mailto:j...@thejof.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 1:51 PM
To: nanog
Subject: Re: news from Google
Excerpts from Charles Wyble's message of Thu Dec 03
Deepak Jain wrote:
> I think there are amazing opportunities to data mine and prevent fraud if you
> can get a percentage of your users using this.
>
> I'm really excited about the structured attacks that will be run against this
> thing (cache poisoning... and nastier)... if (for example) when
On 12/3/09 12:10 PM, "Chris Stebner" wrote:
> For over a month now I've been fighting with Comcast Customer Security
> Assurance regarding a simple BlackList issue. Apparently there is some
> disconnect between internal applications and their ability to report
> BlackList status accurately and th
Andrey Gordon wrote:
> uf, another question I'll have ask my users now:
>
> User: I can't get to the intranet.mycompanydomain.local! What did you
> break!?
> Me: Hey, you can't to the intranet,domain.local? Did you make your laptop
> use Google DNS?
But it is s easy to just route 8.8.8.8 and
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Scott Berkman wrote:
> Also reminds me of the Level 3 DNS servers in the 4.2.2.[1-8++] range.
>
> -Scott
>
I suppose I've been too brainwashed by HTTP...I looked at that, and
thought that it would amusing to have a DNS server in the 4.0.2 range. ^_^;
(for
Does anyone know of any tools that can do repeated traceroutes over time
to a remote IP and log the results for later viewing/comparison? I'd
like to do a traceroute several times a day and store the details in CVS
or somewhere accessible down the road. Alerting to major path changes
would be
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> Andrey Gordon wrote:
> > uf, another question I'll have ask my users now:
> >
> > User: I can't get to the intranet.mycompanydomain.local! What did you
> > break!?
> > Me: Hey, you can't to the intranet,domain.local? Did you make your laptop
On 12/3/09 11:48 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Jorge Amodio wrote:
now Google DNS, anything more?
GoogleNation.
No kiddng. I must be the only one who is getting tired of seeing Google
take over literally everything.
~Seth
Why is it that people start cracking out at the thought of Google
off
Justin Shore wrote:
> Does anyone know of any tools that can do repeated traceroutes over time
> to a remote IP and log the results for later viewing/comparison?
RIPE TTM @ http://www.ripe.net/ttm/
Greets,
Jeroen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Brielle Bruns wrote:
Why is it that people start cracking out at the thought of Google
offering a free service that people might have an actual use for and
that is completely optional and used by choice?
I take it you've never been on the receiving end of a "the whole
internet is down it'
I generally like goog's services and the fact that they are free, but
sometimes google makes me think of all those futuristic movies where there
is a single corporation running the world, everyone is 'tagged' and tracked
24/7 and everyone who works for that corporation are happy campers and live
in
On 12/3/09 2:44 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
I take it you've never been on the receiving end of a "the whole
internet is down it's your fault cuz google never breaks" call when
google hiccups?
Actually, I have. I used to have to deal with gems like 'Your DNS
server is attacking my machine in po
Kain, Becki (B.) wrote:
> No kiddng. I must be the only one who is getting tired of seeing Google
> take over literally everything.
Nobody as far as I can tell has a Monoploy on bad ideas...
joel
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 02:04:55PM -0700, Brielle Bruns's said:
>Why is it that people start cracking out at the thought of Google
>offering a free service that people might have an actual use for and
>that is completely optional and used by choice?
>
>It's a free service people! No di
Brielle Bruns wrote:
Why is it that people start cracking out at the thought of Google
offering a free service that people might have an actual use for and
that is completely optional and used by choice?
It's a free service people! No different then Hotmail, or Yahoo Mail,
or Gmail, AOL Inst
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Ken Chase wrote:
> We all know that google is leveraging cross-referenceable information from all
> of its services for its profit/advantage ...
>
> /kc
> --
> Ken Chase - k...@heavycomputing.ca - +1 416 897 6284 - Toronto CANADA
> Heavy Computing - Clued bandwidth,
Hello Jeroen.
I very much like Ping Plotter. http://www.pingplotter.com/
John
John Souvestre - New Orleans LA
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeroen Massar [mailto:jer...@unfix.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 3:16 PM
> To: Justin Shore
> Cc: NANOG list
> Subject: Re: Hi
You mean like this?
http://arstechnica.com/telecom/news/2009/12/sprint-fed-customer-gps-data-to-leos-over-8-million-times.ars?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss
and this?
http://almartinraw.com/public/column417.html
just wait til google sews up all voice communications.
On Thu, De
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 4:26 PM, John Souvestre wrote:
> Hello Jeroen.
>
> I very much like Ping Plotter. http://www.pingplotter.com/
>
> John
>
>
We've used Ping Plotter before as well. Some shortcomings, but works well
for what it's supposed to do.
--
Brandon Galbraith
Mobile: 630.400.6992
FN
Thanks for the updates Paul, good to see such policies in place at Google.
I still personally hope for the great benevolent open-source-trumpeting
/privacy-protecting giant to exist and operate exactly as it does in geeks'
wildest fantasies. Really I do.
However, I suppose you can make few admiss
Or the whole turning over records from Youtube...
Nothing prevents them from changing policies in the future when it becomes more
difficult for millions of users to change away... (vis-à-vis the uproar when FB
was going to change its privacy policy and more as it continues to do so).
> -
Mark Newton wrote:
The fact that someone got OpenWRT working in less than a week of spare
time makes it totally clear why the commercial vendors haven't done
anything: They're just simply not interested, nothing more, nothing
less.
I suspect they didn't use DHCPv6-PD with that OpenWRT. I've ha
LOL.
One place I worked at hosted a bunch of websites and called them by business
unit. so xxx_nnn
One business unit was particularly problematic and frequently returned 500
errors. The version in production was xxx_4xx when the next major rev came
out we skipped 5xx and went to 6xx. :)
One of the better/only decent implementations I have run across in the retail
world so far is the D-Link 615SW. Look for the IPv6_Ready Gold cert emblem
(found this on an encap at Fry's and nobody in the department knew what IPv6
was) on the front of the box for easy recognition although there a
talking about evil http://www.bing.com/ :
>Oops
>This isn't the page you wanted!
>
>Try this
>Refresh the page. If you get this message again, please check back later.
>
>Ref A: 7d09ba2186d4448a8dd2b99ad2c12b3a Ref B:
>B498C04FE4F5DC107DF8FC65998D9838 >Ref >C: Thu Dec 03 18:54:06 2009 PST
While
That is an Akami error.
On Dec 3, 2009, at 6:57 PM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
> talking about evil http://www.bing.com/ :
>
>> Oops
>> This isn't the page you wanted!
>>
>> Try this
>> Refresh the page. If you get this message again, please check back later.
>>
>> Ref A: 7d09ba2186d4448a8dd2b99ad2
Give their emulator a try:
http://support.dlink.com/emulators/dir615_revC/310NA/login.htm
Perhaps this is a dumb question, but without DHCPv6 IA_PD support, how are
"other" large service providers rolling out IPv6 for their cable broadband,
xDSL, BWA, and FTTH customers? 100% SLAAC?
Frank
-
Lots of travel, 6 month contract, 4G build-out. Contact Voshte at
vgustaf...@kforce.com.
--
Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, Jorge Amodio wrote:
now Google DNS, anything more?
GoogleNation.
Google Opt-out Village:
http://www.theonion.com/content/video/google_opt_out_feature_lets_users
-Hank
DHCPv6 PD is pretty crucial.
I'd love to see the code in an ADSL box (hint hint hint DLINK).
MMC
Frank Bulk wrote:
Give their emulator a try:
http://support.dlink.com/emulators/dir615_revC/310NA/login.htm
Perhaps this is a dumb question, but without DHCPv6 IA_PD support, how are
"other" lar
j...@thejof.com
: 6.6.6.6 belongs to the US Army
look at AS 666. At least they know their position in the universe.
---
andrey.gor...@gmail.com
: IMHO that's where we are heading with google taking over every service
imaginable
Only if you l
79 matches
Mail list logo
