Hi Bobby,
Can your monitoring system use other ports (per host) for SNMP? In that case
you could user port forwarding (and up to 60,000 hosts this should be fine),
with static NAT this would be a good option I guess.
With kind regards,
Mark Scholten
-Original Message-
From: Bobby Mac
Anyone have a good source for finding contractors in Europe,
specifically Switzerland, to do datacenter racking and cabling? A list
or contractor site would be helpful. I am looking for 4 people, 2 in
Berne and 2 in Zurich, for a small project in early April for about a
week.
Thanks,
-Flint
By the virtue of CCITT X.666 Hyperspace Transport Protocol your
messages have been transported within different space-time
coordinates, best guess check your PC Real Time Clock.
Cheers
Jorge
Hey -
We're currently looking for a small lt2p/pptp concentrator, mainly so
people can connect via their iphones/androids with some vpn client to
get email on the go.
Does anyone have any boxes that they love/hate?
Thanks for the advice
Leslie
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Leslie les...@craigslist.org wrote:
Hey -
We're currently looking for a small lt2p/pptp concentrator, mainly so people
can connect via their iphones/androids with some vpn client to get email on
the go.
Does anyone have any boxes that they love/hate?
I didn't realize that os x server can run this - and pretty much anyone
can set up os x in 5 seconds -- anyone have any horror stories?
Bryan Irvine wrote:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Leslie les...@craigslist.org wrote:
Hey -
We're currently looking for a small lt2p/pptp concentrator,
Hello, Leslie,
Can you define small?
How does a GNU/Linux server, which is able to terminate 200+
PPTP/IPSec(L2TP) sessions on a moderately old hardware, sound? Having
that, you only need iPhones/Androids (v 1.6 and above) configured with
their native VPN clients, and you're ready... :)
On Wed,
I know someone who's run an OS X server VPN for years without issue.
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Leslie les...@craigslist.org wrote:
I didn't realize that os x server can run this - and pretty much anyone can
set up os x in 5 seconds -- anyone have any horror stories?
Bryan Irvine
Sorry for a non-NANOG related message. Anyone with a direct security
contact at F5 please shoot me a message off-list.
--
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
J. Oquendo
SGFA, SGFE, C|EH, CNDA, CHFI, OSCP
It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to
ruin
Are there any common locations in Alaska where multiple local ISPs
exchange traffic, either transit or peering? Or is Seattle the closest
exchange point for Alaska ISPs?
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Sean Donelan wrote:
Are there any common locations in Alaska where multiple local ISPs exchange
traffic, either transit or peering? Or is Seattle the closest exchange point
for Alaska ISPs?
peeringdb.com lists only SIX (in Seattle) and PAIX Seattle.
Antonio Querubin
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Leslie les...@craigslist.org wrote:
We're currently looking for a small lt2p/pptp concentrator, mainly so people
can connect via their iphones/androids with some vpn client to get email on
the go.
If you're looking for ease of client configuration, try a Cisco
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
nope. in japan, there is still far more powerpoint than packets. i
have ntt ftth. it is v4 only. i have to tunnel to iij to get v6.
do not believe powerpoint.
NTT also charges its (wholesale) IP transit customers a premium
On Mar 3, 2010, at 7:05 PM, Paul Wall wrote:
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
nope. in japan, there is still far more powerpoint than packets. i
have ntt ftth. it is v4 only. i have to tunnel to iij to get v6.
do not believe powerpoint.
NTT also
On Mar 3, 2010, at 3:13 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
Are there any common locations in Alaska where multiple local ISPs exchange
traffic, either transit or peering? Or is Seattle the closest exchange point
for Alaska ISPs?
PCH doesn't know of any. If any exist, we'd very much like to hear
Formation of a U.S. Delegation to the ITU Meeting on IPv6, March 15 and 16
in Geneva
Will the State Department also provide hardware and ammo ?
Regards
Jorge
Hello All ,
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Bill Woodcock wrote:
On Mar 3, 2010, at 3:13 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
Are there any common locations in Alaska where multiple local ISPs exchange
traffic, either transit or peering? Or is Seattle the closest exchange point
for Alaska ISPs?
PCH
Would anyone on list be kind enough to provide an iperf server for
testing through a Level3 link in Miami? Atlanta or other close nodes
should work as well. Throughput 100Mbps.
Thanks in advance.
Charles N Wyble char...@knownelement.com wrote:
The biggest problem is middle mile. That is where the money needs to go.
You need something to back haul to the interwebz. There is a lot of
fiber in the ground already,
Another possible way to solve the middle mile issue would again be to
use
deles...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe I'm wrong on this,
You are I'm afraid.
and I'm not a mailadmin anywhere nor have I been or pretended to have been in
the past. But I'm pretty sure FB only sends you mail based on the prefrences
you choose, and I know this is the answer you where given so
20 matches
Mail list logo
