>> If "every significant router on the market" supported IPv6 five years ago,
>
> and if cash fell from the sky ...
>
> to folk actually running real networks, 'support' means *parity* with
> ipv4, i.e. fast path at decent rates, management and monitoring, no
> licensing extortion, ...
>
> we don't
This sounds like
Step 1: I have a wisdom tooth, it hurts on my right jaw and so I will chew
from my left.
Step 2: Take some pain killers.
Step 3: Damn it hurts I will ignore it and it will eventually heal.
Step 4: Continue to take pain killers and perhaps if I sleep more it will
grow in the rig
On Apr 3, 2010, at 2:49 PM, Zaid Ali wrote:
> They are not glowing because applications are simply not moving to IPv6.
> Google has two popular applications on IPv6, Netflix is on it way there but
> what are other application companies doing about it? A popular application
> like e-mail is so far
On Apr 3, 2010, at 1:03 AM, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> Owen DeLong wrote:
>> It was thought that we would not have nearly so many people connected to the
>> internet. It was expected that most things connecting to the internet would
>> be minicomputers and mainframes.
>
> It took some visionary
Someone in another thread mentioned interop show network. Which made me
curious and I did a bit of searching. I found the following article from
2008 about the interop show:
http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27583
The show could setup an IPv6 only network in order to showcase it?
Tha
101 - 105 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
