Am 25.04.2010 um 03:29 schrieb Mark Smith:
> If obscurity is such an effective measure why are zebras also able to
> run fast and kick hard?
Because the stripes hide them from the flies, not the lions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zebra#cite_note-5
--
Stefan BethkeFon +49 151 14070811
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:48:18 -0400
Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Mark Smith
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:25:46 -0400
> > Christopher Morrow wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> >> > While I think this is an improvement, unl
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:18:56 -0700
Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> Owen DeLong wrote:
> > On Apr 22, 2010, at 5:55 AM, Jim Burwell wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> On 4/22/2010 05:34, Simon Perreault wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 2010-04-22 07:18, William H
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu writes:
>
> Ours are currently intentionally configured to not issue queries over IPv6,
> because at one time, there were *so many* sites that listed unreachable quad-A
> NS records. Our DNS guy is more than willing to revisit that config switch.
>
> Anybody have some statis
On 04/22/2010 10:18 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> Owen DeLong wrote:
>> On Apr 22, 2010, at 5:55 AM, Jim Burwell wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 4/22/2010 05:34, Simon Perreault wrote:
>>>
On 2010-04-22 07:18, William Herrin wrote:
On 04/22/2010 11:23 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Bill Bogstad wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:03 AM, David Conrad wrote:
>>> On Apr 21, 2010, at 10:48 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> So what happens when you change providers? How are you going to ke
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
No, the problems are probably further back in time. We first started turning up
IPv6 back in 1997 or so. There's a *very* good chance that we turned it off a
decade ago (or whenever people *first* started listing quad-A's in NS entries)
due to breakage and never ac
On 4/24/2010 14:07, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> The patent which bears her and George Antheil's name is by no means (and
> about 30 years) the earliest example of this technology.
Few patents are. I can't think of a one, but I suppose there must be
one containing no prior art at all.
Does a movie sta
On 04/22/2010 08:25 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
> On Apr 22, 2010, at 11:04 AM, John Lightfoot wrote:
>
>> That's Hedley.
>>
>
> I believe that he is talking about Hedy Lamarr, the co-inventor of
> frequency hopping spread spectrum.
The patent which bears her and George Antheil's name is by
FYI - Comcast has dual stacked enabled recursive name servers, see the
following web site:
http://dns.comcast.net/dns-ip-addresses3.php
John
On 4/23/10 8:42 AM, "Jared Mauch" wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 23, 2010, at 5:49 AM, Dave Hart wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 08:26 UTC, Steve Bertrand
On 4/24/10 5:09 AM, Benjamin Billon wrote:
> "fail" or "soft fail"?
>
Soft fail. Someone forwarding to their hotmail account. They also said a
whole bunch of 250's with ID responses never made it to their inbox, and
that it only started happening within the last week.
~Seth
FYI There is some routing flakiness going on with Level 3 this morning,
which L3 confirms. Some routes sent to their network are dying, some not. We
are having reach ability issues over them on the west coast.
Bypassing level 3 for the moment.
Bryan
On 23/04/2010, at 6:26 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>
> This is a personal research project, in which I want to learn about the
> health of connectivity, and about other situations that causes breakage
> that I haven't considered before.
>
A very fine objective in my opinion. There are a few simil
"fail" or "soft fail"?
Le 23/04/2010 19:50, Seth Mattinen a écrit :
On 4/23/10 7:09 AM, Greg Estabrooks wrote:
Is anyone else out there getting reports of hotmail randomly bouncing
emails with just a message of "failed"?
Over the last 2 weeks we've had a dozens of complaints of hosting
c
14 matches
Mail list logo
