On Fri, 7 May 2010, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
David Conrad wrote:
Perhaps a bit off-topic, but some folks might get support calls...
http://وزارة-الأتصالات.مصر/
That actually looks quite handsome. :-)
And this is what it looks like to DNS:
http://xn--4gbrim.xnrmckbbajlc6dj7bxne2c.xn--w
David Conrad wrote:
Perhaps a bit off-topic, but some folks might get support calls...
http://وزارة-الأتصالات.مصر/
That actually looks quite handsome. :-)
--
http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
This report has been generated at Fri May 7 21:12:12 2010 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
BGP Update Report
Interval: 29-Apr-10 -to- 06-May-10 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS17488 61957 4.8% 53.7 -- HATHWAY-NET-AP Hathway IP Over
Cable Internet
2 - AS9498
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net
For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net.
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith .
Routing
On May 6, 2010, at 11:14 PM, James Hess wrote:
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM, L. Gabriel Somlo
wrote: ..
I wonder if DNS for GLOP/RFC3180 is still expected to work/be
supported,
or should I just give up :) > Thanks,
I am not sure, but I believe as a best practice, RFC3180 is
cons
6 matches
Mail list logo