Hi all -
I must have missed the announcement about NANOG changing hands. Can someone
point me to the URL where the background, motivation, and plan are described to
the NANOG Community?
Thanks.
Bill
___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Hi Bill,
First email to -announce:
http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog-announce/2010-April/77.html
And the resulting threads here:
http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog-futures/2010-April/thread.html
That's what has been published so far, with more details promised in the near
On 2010-05-29, at 13:08, Daniel Golding wrote:
As I understand it, there is no merit nanog account. While such has
been talked about, it is evidently a myth.
The fact that Merit have presented accounts for NANOG many times in the past
demonstrates that there's a separate NANOG account at
Hi Bill,
I suspect that Merit, with stimulus funding in hand, may have other
non-NANOG interests at this point. I hope you are able to attend the
community meeting and that Don Welch will clarify Merit's long-term
interest. Cheers, -ren
2010/5/31 William Norton bill.nor...@gmail.com:
I do look forward to hear what Don has to say, but it sounds like Merit is the
passive one here - we will do what the community wants and all that.
It seems like the side that has ambitions to take over the meeting is actually
the one in the spotlight to demonstrate to the community that it
Pretty sure there is no need for Jerry Springer-antics. Give it time
as requested by many. This could be a mutual decision to prepare for
the option you listed as 'c'.
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 6:13 PM, William Norton bill.nor...@gmail.com wrote:
I do look forward to hear what Don has to say,
On May 31, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Ren Provo ren.pr...@gmail.com wrote:
Pretty sure there is no need for Jerry Springer-antics. Give it time
as requested by many.
I haven't read this sentiment from anyone. URL please.
This could be a mutual decision to prepare for
the option you listed as 'c'.
Something weird today when I did some more tests today...
When I configured a subinterface with the: ip pim sparse-mode
(config)#int GigabitEthernet 3/0.310
(config-subif)#ip pim sparse-mode
May 31 15:48:40.218 CET: %PIM-5-DRCHG: DR change from neighbor 0.0.0.0 to
10.11.130.1 on interface
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:16:14AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
I remember a posting to this list back in the late 90s from Tony Li,
who knows a bit about BGP. He urged that multi-hop BGP never be used
and pointed out that it had not been intended for use except as a test
tool, not a
9 matches
Mail list logo
